TODAY'S PAPER
30° Good Morning
30° Good Morning

Podcast – Chapter 1

Newsday and Levittown | Chapter 1: Newsday blinks

The storage attic in Newsday’s former Melville building was not a place for public display. It was cold and drafty, a door open to the elements. A fire proofing substance haphazardly lined the walls.But the material there was important not just to Newsday, but Long Islanders: the paper’s archives, including hundreds of interview tapes about Newsday and Long Island history.

I went up to the attic to learn more about why Newsday’s editorial board was muted for years about racial covenants in Levittown, a question prompted by the paper’s just-released investigation into real estate practices in the present day.

What I found is the subject of the Newsday Opinion podcast, “Newsday and Levittown,” co-produced with Amanda Fiscina.

Many of the tapes from the attic deal with Newsday’s founder, Alicia Patterson, a pioneering female publisher, pilot and high-society staple: “Sort of a princess,” one employee calls her in a marveling tone. “She was used to a woman having to make her point more precisely than a man would,” remembers a friend in another tape. It was Patterson who made many of the early decisions about the paper’s crusades.

The crusades worked, including the one to encourage more housing for veterans after World War II.

This is how Newsday’s history intersects with Levittown’s, a story told in the tapes, scratchy with age. Patterson decided that people needed houses, and that builder William Levitt was just what Long Island needed. So Patterson put her might behind him.

She did so by campaigning for a change in local building codes, eliminating the requirement for a basement, to smooth the way for Levitt’s project.

“Newsday jumped into the fight on the side of the veterans,” a Newsday promotional video from the 1960s says, triumphant old-timey music playing in the background (you can hear an excerpt in the podcast). The editorial board encouraged readers to come out to a Hempstead Town Board meeting to show their support for the houses, too.

“None of us will ever forget that meeting. Thousands of veterans answered Newsday’s call,” the promotional video cheers.

It was a prime example of Patterson’s fighting spirit and the way she made her paper into a fighter, too.

“There was a crusading spirit on the entire newspaper and I loved it, I just thought it was wonderful,” says Robert Caro, Pulitzer Prize-winning historian and former Newsday reporter, in one of the tapes.

She was a fierce advocate for Long Island. “She wanted it to have a zoo, she wanted it to have housing, she wanted it to have good streets,” chimes in her friend Phyllis Cerf Wagner. “I mean she just absolutely adored Long Island. It was her child, as the newspaper was her child.”

But the crusading flagged when it came to challenging Levitt, editorial writer Hal Burton says in another tape.

That included, crucially, when Levitt was discriminating against black homeseekers. Newsday’s editorial board at first said there was nothing much to see there.

Why?

The tapes give some suggestions: “She felt strongly on social justice, except for the blacks,” says Burton.

But it’s more complicated than that. As former editorial board member Robert Keeler describes in his 1990 history “Newsday,” for which he recorded and used most of those tapes tucked away in the attic, Patterson had a mixed record on discrimination apart from Levittown. She called out others’ racism and pushed for more Jewish immigration at the dawn of World War II when so many were trying to escape the Nazis. It was a tragically uncommon position.

So our podcast looks at other factors: the way that the growth of the suburbs encouraged by Levitt and Newsday was key to Newsday’s business. How the paper’s stance was in some ways sadly the norm for the time.

But that’s just half the story. To see what effect all this had, I left the attic and started making new recordings. I talked to people who live in Levittown now, and others who wanted to but couldn’t.

On this podcast, you’ll hear from a white family from the Bronx that had a house all set in Levittown but turned it down when they learned about the discrimination on display. Academics discuss the home values black residents missed out on when they couldn’t buy into up-and-coming Levittown.

And there’s a conversation from a meeting of the Levittown Historical Society, in the lower part of a school off Abbey Lane marked by suburban memorabilia and old photos. It was one of various times residents talked to me candidly about the beauties of life in Levittown, peach trees and open yards, everything Levittown represented and offered for families looking to start out on their own, and what it has meant over the years even as some have been excluded. Because the debates over Levittown, more than 70 years later, are still ongoing.

And Newsday, then and now, has been a part of it.


Hosted by Mark Chiusano, a member of the Newsday editorial board. Produced by Amanda Fiscina.

Levittown Water Tower

Levittown Water Tower

Phyllis, William Jr., John, and Mr. and Mrs. William Cotter. Credit: Jim O’Rourke/Newsday

Bill Levitt. Credit: Dan Sheehan/Newsday

Christopher Neidt

Christopher Neidt

The Cotter house in 1953.

Long Islanded Divided series by Newsday.

Newsday editorial, 1949

Dateline: Long Island/Hartley Productions

Dateline: Long Island/Hartley Productions

Dateline: Long Island/Hartley Productions

Dateline: Long Island/Hartley Productions

Dateline: Long Island/Hartley Productions

Dateline: Long Island/Hartley Productions

Joshua Ruff

Dateline: Long Island/Hartley Productions

Dateline: Long Island/Hartley Productions

Herbie Wheeler

Herbie Wheeler

Dateline: Long Island/Hartley Productions

Dateline: Long Island/Hartley Productions

Letter to the editor October 1947

Letter to the editor October 1947

Newsday editorial board response 1947

Newsday editorial board response 1947

Original Levittown lease in archive

Original Levittown lease. Credit: Levittown Historial Society

Newsday editorial 1949

Newsday editorial 1949

Editorial August 1948

Newsday editorial 1949

Editorial August 1948

Newsday editorial 1948

Editorial 1957 10 years later

Newsday editorial 1957

Oct. 15 Democratic debate: Editorial Board and Point readers pick winner

Oct. 15 Democratic debate: Editorial Board and Point readers pick winner

The 2020 Democratic presidential primary season may have been overshadowed by the House impeachment inquiry and events in the Middle East but it returns to the fore Tuesday night with a fourth debate.

Members of Newsday’s editorial board will evaluate the positions of the 12 candidates on the stage. This debate focuses on foreign policy, and how well they would conduct themselves as president on the national stage.

Our ratings will be done on a scale of one to five stars. Five, of course, being the best. The ratings are not an endorsement of any candidate, his or her views or policy positions. Instead, the ratings are a measure of how well the candidates contribute to the national discussion.

Readers of The Point, our newsletter, have the exclusive opportunity to rate the candidates along with editorial board members. Join The Point here.

The Editorial Board selected Pete Buttigieg as the debate winner tonight and Elizabeth Warren came in second. Point readers picked Pete Buttigieg as well and Cory Booker came in second. Here are key takeaways from Tuesday’s debate from members of Newsday’s Editorial Board:

Mark Chiusano: Tuesday’s debate may have been the best showing for the moderates, with Amy Klobuchar and Pete Buttigieg getting more primetime attention while they jabbed the leading progressives, particularly Elizabeth Warren — though all the jabbing may have indicated how much Warren has been surging.

Rita Ciolli: The second tier candidates in the polls, Pete Buttigieg, Amy Klobuchar and Cory Booker, stood out. Elizabeth Warren never rose to her new front-runner status and Joe Biden seemed sharper. But finally, the question is being called on how do you execute some of these outsized proposals, such as taking away assault weapons or paying for Medicare for all.

Matt Davies: As Pete Buttigieg reminds us, when the impeachment and election process has played out, America is going to be more divided than ever. As good at communicating as each of these politicians have become out on the campaign trail, trying to figure out which of them can compete against the forces of Trumpism is increasingly daunting.

Michael Dobie: If anyone outside the top three had a breakout performance it was Pete Buttigieg, who has command of a lot of subjects; Elizabeth Warren emerged from the tag-team pummeling staggering, but upright; Joe Biden showed that flubs for him are a feature not a bug, and the people on the flanks proved why they’re on the flanks.

Lane Filler: With total support for the moderate camp and the progressive camp in the race split nearly evenly, it’s becoming apparent that whichever wing stops its own infighting first and unites behind a standard bearer will seize the nomination.

Randi F. Marshall: Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar found their voices tonight and distinguished themselves from the three candidates at the center of the stage, but they’re going to have to find ways to capitalize on that success, because the other three didn’t really falter. Elizabeth Warren seemed to remain at the top, even as she endured attacks from all sides.

Eli Reyes: Plenty of ideological differences among Democrats in this debate, and all the talk about unity will likely do little to close those gaps.

Lawrence Striegel: Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar found stronger voices in challenging Elizabeth Warren. Warren needs to do better against such heat to succeed.

Final result

Presidential candidates

Oct. 15 Democratic debate: Point readers rate the candidates

Democratic debate watch: Live rating of the candidates

Thank you for joining us tonight.

We will be exploring more exclusive Point reader perks in the future, stay tuned.

If you missed our Democratic debate experience, subscribe to The Point to stay informed and for more opportunities to join us in the coming months.

Sept 12 Democratic debate: Point readers rate the candidates

Democratic debate watch: Live rating of the candidates

Thank you for joining us tonight.

We will be exploring more exclusive Point reader perks in the future, stay tuned.

If you missed our Democratic debate experience, subscribe to The Point to stay informed and for more opportunities to join us in the coming months.

Sept. 12 Democratic debate: Editorial Board and Point readers pick winner

Sept. 12 Democratic debate: Editorial Board and Point readers pick winner

The 2020 Democratic presidential primary season continues this week – with another round of debates.

Members of Newsday’s editorial board will again evaluate the candidates’ debate performances on a scale of one to five stars. Five, of course, being the best. The ratings are not an endorsement of any candidates, his or her views or policy positions. Instead, the ratings are a measure of how well the candidates contribute to the national discussion.

Readers of The Point, our newsletter, have the exclusive opportunity to rate the candidates along with editorial board members. Join The Point here.

That’s a wrap on this week’s Democratic Debate, the third one of the 2020 campaign. Thanks for following us tonight.

The Editorial Board selected Elizabeth Warren as the winner tonight and Pete Buttigieg as the runner-up. Point readers picked Elizabeth Warren as well and picked Joe Biden as the runner-up. Here are key takeaways from Wednesday’s debate from members of Newsday’s Editorial Board:

Mark Chiusano: There were few game-changing moments, with the candidates carefully sticking to their lanes. An exception: Julian Castro’s full-frontal attack on Joe Biden, a Swalwell-moment which may have angered more people than it impressed.

Rita Ciolli: Joe Biden not dethroned; Elizabeth Warren remains strong, Cory Booker and Pete Buttigieg very solid. But Dems still fussing over policy differences, not drawing sharp ideological contrasts with Donald Trump.

Michael Dobie: Elizabeth Warren was polished and passionate, Pete Buttigieg was smooth and inspirational in closing, and Joe Biden was the roller derby guy who keeps getting hit but is still skating at the end.

Matt Davies: All the candidates have noticeably sharpened and honed their messages and presentation, with the surprising and notable exception perhaps of Joe Biden. Dems seem to now be facing an epic primary struggle between the issue of “electability” vs. “best candidate.”

Lane Filler: Long before the first caucus or primary it’s becoming clear that Elizabeth Warren is the Democrats’ strongest candidate, and moderating her stances on outlawing private health insurance and imposing massive tax increases is their best shot at victory.

Randi F. Marshall: Several candidates, including Pete Buttigieg, Elizabeth Warren, and Beto O’Rourke had key breakout moments, and even with some stumbles, Joe Biden held his own. In the end, tonight’s debate is unlikely to change anything in the big picture of this Democratic field.

Eli Reyes: Julian Castro’s apparent attack on Joe Biden’s age will hurt him. The age factor is worth debating, but does not deserve to be mocked.

Lawrence Striegel: No clear winner in my view – but Andrew Yang, Elizabeth Warren and Pete Buttigieg helped their causes; Joe Biden and others held even; Kamala Harris, not so much.

Final result

Presidential candidates

Democratic debate watch night 2: Editorial Board and Point readers pick winner

Democratic debate watch night 2: Editorial Board and Point readers pick winner

The 2020 Democratic presidential primary season returned this week for another round of debates.

To evaluate the debate performance of these disparate candidates, members of the Newsday editorial board rated each contender on overall performance on a scale of one to five stars, with five being the best. These ratings are not endorsements of any candidate or his or her views; rather, they are a measure of how well the candidates contribute to the national discussion.

Point readers also had the exclusive opportunity to rate with us as well. Check out the winner the editorial board and Point readers chose in Tuesday night’s debate round.

That’s a wrap on night two of the Democratic debates this week. Thanks for following us Tuesday and tonight.

The Editorial Board selected Joe Biden as the winner tonight and Point readers picked Biden as well. The Editorial Board and Point readers both selected Elizabeth Warren in Tuesday’s debate round. Here are key takeaways from Wednesday’s debate from members of Newsday’s Editorial Board:

Mark Chiusano: Picture nine opposition research mavens hanging off and clawing at a 76-year-old aging standard bearer of his party, and you watched the snippy second night of CNN’s Democratic debates. There, I saved you three hours.

Rita Ciolli: Cory Booker more effective than Kamala Harris in trying to derail Joe Biden but neither delivered the knockout punch progressives wanted. Instead, Biden showcased his more realistic approach but can he successfully convince Dems he’s the most electable when on a stage with Elizabeth Warren?

Michael Dobie:Twenty candidates in two nights is just too many, especially with this second group. More sniping, more interruptions by moderators, no inspiration, little uplifting, can’t wait for stage to get winnowed in September.

Matt Davies: I have the additional editorial privilege of wondering which of the candidates will be the most satisfying to draw, but at this stage I’m still not sure. Kamala Harris, Julian Castro and Cory Booker seemed the best prepared and least stilted, as if they were actually in a one-on-one conversation with an actual voter. Notably, Harris said she’d take anyone on the stage over the current president. Alas, Dems have to choose one.

Lane Filler: After the first night many were saying Joe Biden won because Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders are so vulnerable on Medicare For All. Now it feels like Warren and Sanders won tonight, when Biden and Kamala Harris we’re just middling. Someone has to start sounding good while talking.

Randi F. Marshall: Imagine the Tuesday and Wednesday stages combined, and you’d see a scene where Elizabeth Warren takes center stage, surrounded by Cory Booker, Joe Biden, Pete Buttigieg, and Bernie Sanders in the background, with Kamala Harris and Amy Klobuchar trying to find a spotlight that evaded them. After more than five hours of debate, that veered into the dull and passion-less at times tonight, it’s time to figure out who should remain at center stage.

Eli Reyes: Uncle Joe Biden became Fightin’ Joe on Wednesday night, when he went a few rounds with several of Democratic hopefuls. And Kamala Harris was unexpectedly uneven, falling drastically short of a repeat performance of her first debate.

Lawrence Striegel: Joe Biden started strong, especially on health care, but faded somewhat as Cory Booker, Jay Inslee and Tulsi Gabbard had strong moments in night two – but Elizabeth Warren left the strongest impression from both debates.

Final result

Presidential candidates

Democratic debate watch night 2: Point readers rate the candidates

Democratic debate watch: Live rating of the candidates

Thank you for joining us tonight.

We will be exploring more exclusive Point reader perks in the future, stay tuned.

If you missed our Democratic debate experience, subscribe to The Point to stay informed and for more opportunities to join us in the coming months.

Democratic debate watch: Editorial Board and Point readers pick winner

Democratic debate watch: Editorial Board and Point readers pick winner

The 2020 Democratic presidential primary season returns this week for another round of debates.

To evaluate the debate performance of these disparate candidates, members of the Newsday editorial board are rating each contender on their overall performance on a scale of one to five stars, with five being the best. These ratings are not endorsements of any candidate or his or her views; rather, they are a measure of how well the candidates contribute to the national discussion.

That’s a wrap on night one of the Democratic debates this week. If you rated along with us tonight, make sure to come back again tomorrow. If you didn’t, join us for round two Wednesday at 8 p.m by signing up here.

The Editorial Board selected Elizabeth Warren as the winner tonight and Point readers picked Elizabeth Warren as well. Here are key takeaways from Tuesday’s debate from members of the editorial board.

Mark Chiusano: Elizabeth Warren had the key line: she didn’t know why you’d run for president “just to talk about what we really can’t do.” She and Bernie Sanders defended their plans on their own terms while moderates chose caution, not the typical route to Democratic victory.

Rita Ciolli: Elizabeth Warren trounced Bernie Sanders; Steve Bullock earned his spot; Tim Ryan stole the middle from Amy Klobuchar; Pete Buttigieg steadily smart. Marianne Willamson finds a niche.

Michael Dobie: Urgency from all was welcome but too much time was spent attacking Trump, Democrats already don’t like him; Warren and Buttigieg were head of this class.

Lane Filler: A debate unusually heavy on complicated policy questions and answers showcased the debating chops and passion of Elizabeth Warren and the common sense approach of Pete Buttigieg, but the party needs a leader who combines those traits.

Amanda Fiscina: There are clearly limitations with this format and this field size, but despite that we witnessed some substantial public policy discussions. Elizabeth Warren and Pete Buttigieg shined and some lesser-knowns squeezed in notable moments.

Randi F. Marshall: Even with a clear divide in the party and among the candidates, Elizabeth Warren owned this debate, while everyone else just tried to keep up.

Eli Reyes: Early still in this race, but on Tuesday night Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren continued to dictate many of the contours of the Democratic primary.

Lawrence Striegel: Tuesday seemed to present an effort by candidates to distinguish themselves either as broad visionaries or pragmatic moderates – and non-Trumps all around.

Updating live: Current debate night lead

Presidential candidates

Democratic debate round two: How did they do?

Democratic debate round two: How did they do?

It’s round two of the first debates of the 2020 Democratic presidential primary season. See how Wednesday night’s group did here.

To evaluate the debate performance of these disparate candidates, members of the Newsday editorial board are rating each contender in three categories on a scale of one to five stars, with five being the best.

These ratings are not endorsements of any candidate or his or her views; rather, they are a measure of how well the candidates contribute to the national discussion.

You can watch the debate here, and follow @NewsdayOpinion’s Twitter feed to the right as the editorial board members give reasons behind their ratings there.

You can watch the debate here, and follow @NewsdayOpinion’s Twitter feed as the editorial board members give reasons behind their ratings there.

Pick your debate winner and tell us why here.

Ideas:

Did the candidate offer specific ideas and how effectively did he or she present them?

Argument:

How well did the candidate respond to critiques by fellow contenders and questions from moderators?

Appeal:

Did the candidate make a compelling case for his or her ability to be a good president?

Pete Buttigieg won the night with 103 stars out of a possible 120, with Kamala Harris coming in second at 100 and Bernie Sanders third with 87.

Joe Biden

Former Vice President

Bernie Sanders

U.S. Senator, Vermont

Pete Buttigieg

Mayor of South Bend, Indiana

Kamala Harris

U.S. Senator, California

Andrew Yang

Entrepreneur

Kirsten Gillibrand

U.S. Senator, New York

John Hickenlooper

Former Governor, Colorado

Michael Bennet

U.S. Senator, Colorado

Marianne Williamson

Author/Activist

Eric Swalwell

U.S. Representative, California