TODAY'S PAPER
24° Good Evening
24° Good Evening

Know Your Rights Before Your Flights: ‘It’s NOT a Democracy’

2017 has become the year of airline passenger disputes gone viral. But do the videos and photos capture bad airline behavior, bad passenger behavior or something in between? The in-between is where there may be lessons consumers can learn.

Nearly all of the disputes stem from a disconnect between what passengers believe their rights to be and what their rights actually are, said Christopher Elliott, a consumer advocate, author and travel journalist.

“We’re not dealing with common sense when it comes to airlines,” he said. “The way the rules work on the plane are different than on the ground, it’s not a democracy.”

We asked travel experts to share their takes on six recent controversies. Follow this list of don’ts to help you make it to your destination without becoming a headline.

Do NOT ignore the fine print

On March 26, two teenage girls traveling from Denver to Minneapolis were told they could not board their United flight because they were wearing leggings. A third girl wearing leggings changed clothes before she was allowed on. Following backlash, United clarified that the girls had been flying using employee passes, which require those passengers to follow a company dress code that does not allow leggings.

Experts say: Most airlines don’t have specific dress codes for regular passengers but the lesson is the same, Elliot said: Make sure you read the fine print for your ticket to be aware of any restrictions.

George Hobica, founder of airfarewatchdog.com, recommends always finding out airline regulations, but especially when using free tickets.

“As a former airline employee, I have suffered through not being allowed to board,” he said. “If you’re flying on a free pass, you should inform yourself or whoever gives [you the pass] should inform you of company regulations. I would err on the side of dressing up. Up your sartorial game a bit.”

Do NOT refuse to get off the plane

There have been several incidents this year regarding passengers being forced off planes despite having purchased tickets. Perhaps the most notorious example was the removal of Dr. David Dao, a Kentucky doctor who was violently dragged off a United flight from Chicago to Louisville after declining to give up his seat for United employees.

Experts say: United has apologized for the way the situation was handled, but the incident brought to many customers’ attention that airlines do under federal law have the right to bump you from your seat. The easiest way to handle this is to just go ahead and give up your seat when asked, all of the experts said.

Airlines bump customers for a variety of reasons, including needing to transport employees, accommodate an air marshal or because the flight was overbooked. Customers may be chosen to give up their seats based on a variety of reasons, including check-in time.

“Even if you think you’re in the right, and you may be, if you refuse that request you’re in violation of federal law,” Peter Greenberg, CBS News travel editor, said. You can ask for more money to give up your seat, if you choose to do so. Following the incident, United announced it would offer up to $10,000 for customers who volunteer to give up seats on overbooked flights.

Bonus: Read our explainer: What to do when you get bumped

Do NOT start a riot

When Spirit Airlines canceled at least nine flights out of Fort Lauderdale on May 8 after labor negotiations with its pilots failed, angry customers in the Spirit terminal nearly started a riot. Once physical violence began, three Long Islanders were arrested.

On Monday night, May 8, 2017, three Long

Experts say: “Passengers don’t have a right to riot but they should have a right to be compensated in certain circumstances,” Hobica said.

You’re entitled to either a refund or a seat on another flight from the airline, but not much else. Some larger airlines in the U.S. have interline agreements that allow them to schedule customers on another airline. Greenberg said it may be worth checking whether the airline for your next flight has this policy in place (Spirit does not).

“The price you pay for flying an airline without an agreement is you may be sleeping at an airport,” he said. Elliott also advised checking the status of your flight before you leave. It may not help you avoid a canceled plane, but you won’t have to spend as much time at the airport.  

Do NOT ship your pet (unless absolutely necessary)

Simon, a giant rabbit from Worcestershire, England, expected to become the biggest in the world, was shipped via a United Airlines flight to Chicago on April 26, but he never made it to his new owner. He was found dead in his carrier in the cargo hold when the plane arrived, though his breeder said he was in good health when he left.

Experts say: While Simon’s cause of death isn’t clear, all three experts agreed that shipping a pet in the cargo hold is a big risk. “It’s a very dangerous place,” Hobica said. “Many animals perish every year.”

According to the Department of Transportation’s animal death statistics, 136 animals died on flights between January 2012 through February 2017. “It’s tragic and 100 percent preventable,” Elliott said.

Do NOT bring a stroller on-board

One April incident highlighted what parents can and can’t bring with them. In a viral video, an American Airlines flight attendant on a plane from San Francisco to Dallas, is shown yelling at a tearful mother with a baby and another passenger who stepped in to help. According to witnesses, the woman tried to bring a stroller on the plane and the attendant roughly grabbed it.

Experts say: Do your research and check the airline’s carry-on rules before you get to the gate. “There the passenger was at fault,” Hobica said. “Do a little homework. If this passenger had, she would have seen strollers are checked.”

Greenberg said the flight attendant could have handled this situation in a more tactful way, but the lesson for consumers is if a flight attendant tells you something won’t fit, don’t escalate the situation by fighting with them, just listen.

Do NOT use someone else’s ticket

On May 3, a Delta Air Lines customer posted a video to YouTube of his family in a heated dispute with flight attendants over whether his two-year-old could sit in a seat originally purchased for one of his other children who was on a separate flight. The entire family was ultimately kicked off the flight.

Experts say: For security reasons, you can’t take a seat if your name isn’t on the ticket – even if the situation seems innocent enough. That’s standard policy. “Basically, you cannot pull a switcheroo,” Hobica said. Hobica said the father should have purchased a separate seat for his young child in the first place.

Do NOT bring this stuff with you

From gas masks to brass knuckles, click here for a list of things you do NOT want to bring to the airport.

Which Trump ties have ties to Russia, too?

As the House and Senate take on separate investigations into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election, details of meetings and other connections between Russia and those within Trump’s circle continue to surface.

Here’s a breakdown of those connections.

Mike Flynn

Photo credit: AP

Trump ties:

Former national security adviser

Russian ties:

Had contact with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak

In December 2017, Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI, becoming the first Trump White House official to face criminal charges and admit guilt so far in the wide-ranging investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller.

Flynn also agreed to cooperate with Mueller’s probe, which focuses on Russian meddling in the 2016 election and possible coordination between Russia and Trump’s team in the campaign that sent the Republican businessman to the White House.

Court papers make clear that Flynn knows the identities of at least two members of Trump’s transition team who were intimately aware of his outreach to Russian government officials in the weeks before the inauguration.

Mueller’s prosecutors did not reveal the names of the officials, but indicated they were senior and within Trump’s inner circle.

Flynn resigned from the Trump administration after The Washington Post revealed that he misled Vice President Mike Pence about the nature and extent of his contacts with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. But the resignation merely opened the door for a deeper look at Flynn’s activities.

In 2015, Flynn was paid $45,000 for participating in a Moscow event honoring RT, Russia’s state-backed TV network, and another $22,000 for making two Russia-related speeches. Last December, Flynn met with Kisylak at Trump Tower and on Dec. 29 made five phone calls to Kislyak – the same day President Obama announced sanctions against Russia. Though he initially denied it, Flynn did discuss sanctions and could be vulnerable to blackmail, according to intelligence officials.

Donald Trump Jr.

Photo credit: AP

Trump ties:

Son, runs Trump businesses

Russian ties:

Met with Russian lawyer who claimed to have intel on Hillary Clinton

The President’s eldest son met with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya two weeks after his father won the GOP nomination after an intermediary promised him compromising information on Hillary Clinton from the Russian government.

Trump Jr. originally said the meeting was regarding a ban on American adoptions of Russian children, but later released the entire email exchange that led to the meeting which showed he was offered information. Trump Jr. said he considered the information “Political Opposition Research.” Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and then-campaign manager Paul Manafort also attended.

Trump Jr. is operating the family business. In a 2008 speech to a real-estate conference about emerging markets, he told attendees he had traveled to Russia six times in an 18-month period, saying that “buyers have been attracted to our projects.” The President himself has claimed he has no investments in Russia, but his son disclosed that Trump properties have Russian investors.

Jared Kushner

Photo credit: Getty images

Trump ties:

Son-in-law, adviser

Russian ties:

Met with Russian ambassador, Russian banker, Russian lawyer; directed Flynn to contact Russian officials in December, sources say

The president’s son-in-law, a key member of the administration’s inner circle, met during the election campaign with the Russian ambassador and a top-level Russian banker to discuss sanctions and a “backdoor channel” to Vladimir Putin, according to several reports.

Kushner has agreed to testify before the Senate investigative committee. A Trump spokesman has said Kushner’s meetings were appropriate, given that he functioned as the person of contact with foreign officials during the campaign.

He also attended the meeting between Trump Jr. and the Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, which emails show was arranged under the premise that Veselnitskaya had compromising information about Hillary Clinton.

He is believed to be the “very senior official” who Michael Flynn said directed him to contact Russian officials around Dec. 22 about a UN resolution regarding Israel, NBC News reported Dec. 1, citing two people familiar with the matter.

Paul Manafort

Photo credit: AP

Trump ties:

Former campaign manager

Russian ties:

Did work for Ukraine, Russian billionaire; met with Russian lawyer

Trump chose the longtime Republican operative to take over his campaign in March 2016 as an effort to broaden and professionalize an operation that was gaining steam. But Manafort resigned in August after reports that he was part of a covert Washington lobbying operation on behalf of Pro-Russia factions in Ukraine without disclosing that work to the U.S. government. The Associated Press reported that Manafort’s firm received at least $1 million for his efforts, with payments coming from a bank in Belize. The U.S. Treasury Department, working with the FBI and CIA, also is looking at financial payments Manafort might have received through banks in Cyprus.

Further, AP reported that Manafort once secretly worked for a Russian billionaire close to Putin on a communications plan to influence politics, business dealings and news reports to Russia’s benefit.

Manafort’s spokesman has contended the work for the Ukrainian faction was “totally open and appropriate.” Manafort confirmed that he worked for Oleg Deripaska, the Russian billionaire, but said the work wasn’t pro-Russia in nature.

He also attended the meeting between Trump Jr. and the Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, which emails show was arranged under the premise that Veselnitskaya had compromising information about Hillary Clinton.

Carter Page

Photo credit: AP

Trump ties:

Former adviser to campaign

Russian ties:

Investigated as Russian agent

A former foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, Page traveled to Moscow last summer, giving a Russian-friendly speech and meeting with a confidant of Russian President Vladimir Putin. After Page left the campaign, intelligence officials obtained a warrant to monitor his communications, reportedly on the suspicion that he was a Russian agent. They reportedly cited communications intercepted in 2013 concerning a Russian officer trying to recruit Page, who has vigorously denied any wrongdoing. Page worked in Moscow for three years (2004-7) as a Merrill Lynch executive.

Trump personally announced Page as a member of his campaign’s foreign policy team in March 2016, but has since distanced himself.

Jeff Sessions

Photo credit: AP

Trump ties:

U.S. attorney general

Russian ties:

Met with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak

The U.S. attorney general, during testimony under oath at his confirmation hearings, had twice told senators that he had no contact with any representative of the Russian government about the 2016 election before or after Election Day. Then The Washington Post reported that Sessions in fact met with Kisylak in July and September. Sessions recanted his previous statements and said he would recuse himself from any campaign-related investigations.

Rex Tillerson

Photo credit: AP

Trump ties:

Secretary of state

Russian ties:

Developed as CEO of ExxonMobile

The secretary of state is the former CEO of ExxonMobil, where he developed deep ties with Russia. In 2011, his company signed a $500 billion joint venture with Rosneft, the Russian state oil company, to drill for oil on the Arctic shelf and develop oil in Siberia. Soon after, Putin gave Tillerson the Russian “Order of Friendship” medal.

In his first weeks in office, Tillerson reportedly has stood for holding a hard line on the economic sanctions imposed on Russia after it invaded Crimea. Unlike Trump, Tillerson has said it’s “well-established” that Russians meddled in the 2016 U.S. election. He met with Putin in April; the two reportedly found little agreement on issues such as sanctions and Syria.

Roger Stone

Photo credit: AP

Trump ties:

Friend, adviser

Russian ties:

Communicated with suspected Russian operative

A self-proclaimed political “dirty trickster” going back to the Nixon years, Stone has been a longtime Trump friend and adviser and former associate of Paul Manafort’s. Along with Manafort, Flynn and Page, Stone is one of four people whose calls and contacts with Russian officials are under investigation by U.S. law enforcement, according to The New York Times.

Among other issues, Stone has acknowledged he’s communicated with “Guccifer 2.0,” the online handle that has claimed responsibility for hacking Democratic emails. American officials believe the Guccifer handle is a front for Russian security operatives. But Stone has said the contact was after the hacked emails were released. “It’s only fair that I have a chance to respond 2 any smears or half truths about alleged “Collusion with Russians” from 2day’s Intel Hearing,” Stone wrote on Twitter.

Felix Sater

Photo credit: WireImage/Mark Von Holden

Trump ties:

Works with Trump businesses

Russian ties:

Part of attempts to garner Russian business deals

The Russian-born immigrant (who has a home in Port Washington, records show) once did prison time for stabbing a man in a bar, was convicted in a Mafia-related racketeering scheme in which he later became a witness for the prosecution and has worked as an FBI informant. He also has worked with the Trump organization scouting real-estate deals for more than a decade.

He was part of several attempts by Trump to garner business deals in Russia, starting with a 2005 effort to build a “Trump Tower” in Moscow. In 2006, Sater reportedly accompanied Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump around the city to meet with potential business partners. The tower was never built. But later, Bayrock (which was headquarter in Trump Tower in New York) and Trump partnered to build properties in New York and Florida, financed by Russian and Kazakhstan money, according to a lawsuit, CNN reported.

In February, The New York Times reported that Sater and Michael D. Cohen, the president’s personal lawyer, helped deliver to the Trump administration a Russia-Ukraine peace settlement proposed by a pro-Russia Ukrainian lawmaker. Trump, in a 2013 deposition, reportedly said he barely knew Sater.

Sergey Kisylak

Photo credit: NASA

Trump ties:

Contact with U.S. officials under scrutiny

Russian ties:

Ambassador to U.S.

He has been Russia’s ambassador to the U.S. for 9 years, an uncommonly long tenure. U.S. intelligence officials have called him a spy and a recruiter of spies, according to reports — which Russia denies.

Conversations with Kislyak — prior to Trump taking office — are what led to Flynn’s abrupt resignation and Session’s decision to recuse himself from the various probes of Russian meddling in the U.S. election. His meeting with Trump son-in-law and adviser Jared Kushner also is under scrutiny.

George Papadopoulos

Photo credit: AFP/Getty Images

Trump ties:

Former Trump campaign adviser

Russian ties:

Had contact with Russians

Before joining Trump’s campaign, Papadopoulos billed himself as an international energy consultant – though he only graduated from DePaul University in 2009 and was largely unknown in foreign policy circles.

However, Trump’s campaign named him as one of eight foreign policy advisers in March 2016, as it scrambled to develop policy positions on key international issues.

In October 2017, Papadopoulos pleaded guilty to lying to FBI agents about his dealings with several Russians who were offering information on Trump’s Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton.

As part of a sworn statement to the court, Papadopoulos said he repeatedly met in 2016 with Russians offering “dirt” on Clinton. Papadopoulos says he then relayed that and other messages from the Russians to senior members of Trump’s GOP campaign.

Trump later downplayed Papadopoulos’s role, calling him a mere campaign volunteer and dismissing him as a “liar.”

The ‘Mother Of All Bombs’

U.S. forces in Afghanistan on Thursday struck an Islamic State tunnel complex in eastern Afghanistan with “the mother of all bombs,” the largest non-nuclear weapon ever used in combat by the U.S. military, Pentagon officials said.

The bomb, known officially as a GBU-43B, or massive ordnance air blast weapon, unleashes 11 tons of explosives. When it was developed in the early 2000s, the Pentagon did a formal review of legal justification for its combat use.

The Pentagon said it had no early estimate of deaths or damage caused by its attack, which President Donald Trump called a “very, very successful mission.”

The U.S. military headquarters in Kabul said in a statement that the bomb was dropped at 7:32 p.m. local time Thursday on a tunnel complex in Achin district of Nangarhar province, where the Afghan affiliate of the Islamic State group has been operating. The target was close to the Pakistani border.

Newsday/Rod Eyer

The U.S. estimates 600 to 800 IS fighters are present in Afghanistan, mostly in Nangarhar. The U.S. has concentrated heavily on combatting them while also supporting Afghan forces battling the Taliban. Just last week a U.S. Army Special Forces soldier, Staff Sgt. Mark R. De Alencar, 37, of Edgewood, Maryland, was killed in action in Nangarhar.

The MOAB is a custom-made Air Force weapon that has been in the arsenal for more than a decade but never used on the battlefield, although it was available throughout the Iraq war. It is designed to hit softer targets such as surface facilities, tunnel entrances and troop concentrations. It is pushed out the rear of the launching aircraft, guided to its target by GPS and slowed by a parachute.

A separate non-nuclear weapon known as the Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP, which is larger in its physical dimensions but carries a smaller load of conventional explosives, is designed to take out deeply buried targets like reinforced bunkers. The MOP has never been used in combat.

Washington Post video

In its 2003 review of the legality of using the MOAB, the Pentagon concluded that it could not be called an indiscriminate killer under the Law of Armed Conflict.

“Although the MOAB weapon leaves a large footprint, it is discriminate and requires a deliberate launching toward the target,” the review said. It added: “It is expected that the weapon will have a substantial psychological effect on those who witness its use.”

Adam Stump, a Pentagon spokesman, said the bomb was dropped from a U.S. MC-130 special operations transport. He said the bomb had been brought to Afghanistan “some time ago” for potential use.

A plume of smoke from a GBU-43B test in May 2004. The cloud from the weapon can be seen up to 20 miles away. Northwest Florida Daily News photo via AP

Army Gen. John W. Nicholson, commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, said in a written statement that the strike was designed to minimize the risk to Afghan and U.S. forces conducting clearing operations in the Achin area “while maximizing the destruction” of IS fighters and facilities. He said IS has been using improvised explosive devices, bunkers and tunnels to strengthen its defenses.

“This is the right munition to reduce these obstacles and maintain the momentum of our offensive against ISIS-K,” he added, using the U.S. military’s acronym for the IS affiliate. Ismail Shinwari, the governor of Achin district, said the U.S. attack was carried out in a remote mountainous area with no civilian homes nearby and that there had been no reports of injured civilians. He said there has been heavy fighting in the area in recent weeks between Afghan forces and IS militants.

White House spokesman Sean Spicer said IS fighters had used the tunnels and caves in Achin to maneuver freely.

“The United States takes the fight against ISIS very seriously and in order to defeat the group we must deny them operational space, which we did,” Spicer said.

What we know about the missile strike on Syria

President Donald Trump ordered a missile strike early Friday on a Syrian air base in response to this week’s chemical attack, which marked the first time the U.S. has directly targeted Syrian President Bashar Assad’s forces.

The overnight missile attack was condemned by Assad’s allies in Russia and Iran but welcomed by the Syrian opposition and its supporters, who expressed hope it signaled a turning point in the devastating six-year-old civil war.

The bombing represents Trump’s most dramatic military order since taking office and thrusts the U.S. administration deeper into the complex Syrian conflict.

Here’s what we know about the attack and its implications:

Credit: Newsday / Rod Eyer

The details of the attack

About 60 U.S. Tomahawk missiles hit the Shayrat air base, southeast of Homs, a small installation with two runways, where aircraft often take off to bomb targets in northern and central Syria. The U.S. missiles hit at 3:45 a.m. (0045 GMT) Friday morning and targeted the base’s airstrips, hangars, control tower and ammunition areas, U.S. officials said.

They were fired from two warships in the Mediterranean Sea, in retaliation for Tuesday’s deadly chemical attack, which officials said used chlorine mixed with a nerve agent, possibly sarin.

The Syrian military said at least seven people were killed and nine wounded in the strike.

Trump’s statement

My fellow Americans:

On Tuesday, Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad launched a horrible chemical weapons attack on innocent civilians. Using a deadly nerve agent, Assad choked out the lives of helpless men, women and children. It was a slow and brutal death for so many. Even beautiful babies were cruelly murdered in this very barbaric attack. No child of God should ever suffer such horror.

Tonight, I ordered a targeted military strike on the airfield in Syria from where the chemical attack was launched.

It is in this vital national security interest of the United States to prevent and deter the spread and use of deadly chemical weapons.

There can be no dispute that Syria used banned chemical weapons, violated its obligations under the Chemical Weapons Convention, and ignored the urging of the U.N. Security Council.

Read the full statement

Syria’s response

Assad’s office called the U.S. missile strike “reckless” and “irresponsible.” The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, an opposition monitor, also put the death toll at seven, including a general and three soldiers.

Syria has denied using chemical weapons.

Syrian civil war and U.S. response The U.S. attack on a Syrian air base came after years of heated debate and deliberation in Washington over intervention in the bloody civil war.

01 March 2011

March 2011

Protests erupt in the city of Daraa over security forces' detention of a group of boys accused of painting anti-government graffiti on the walls of their school. On March 15, a protest is held in Damascus' Old City. On March 18, security forces open fire on a protest in Daraa, killing four people in what activists regard as the first deaths of the uprising. Demonstrations spread, as does the crackdown by President Bashar Assad's forces.

01 April 2011

April 2011

Security forces raid a sit-in in Syria's third-largest city, Homs, where thousands of people tried to create the mood of Cairo's Tahrir Square, the epicenter of protests against Egypt's autocrat Hosni Mubarak.

18 August 2011

Obama responds

President Barack Obama calls on Assad to resign and orders Syrian government assets frozen.

20 August 2012

Summer 2012: Fighting spreads to Aleppo

Obama says the use of chemical weapons would be a "red line" that would change his calculus on intervening in the civil war and have "enormous consequences."

19 March 2013

Sarin nerve gas kills 26 people

The Syrian government and opposition trade accusations over a gas attack that killed some 26 people, including more than a dozen government soldiers, in the town of Khan al-Assal in northern Syria. A U.N. investigation later finds that sarin nerve gas was used, but does not identify a culprit.

21 August 2013

Another gas attack kills hundreds

Hundreds of people suffocate in rebel-held suburbs of the Syrian capital, with many suffering from convulsions, pinpoint pupils, and foaming at the mouth. U.N. investigators visit the sites and determine that ground-to-ground missiles loaded with sarin were fired on civilian areas while residents slept. The U.S. and others blame the Syrian government, the only party to the conflict known to have sarin gas.

31 August 2013

Obama lacks support for strikes

Obama says he will go to Congress for authorization to carry out punitive strikes against the Syrian government, but appears to lack the necessary support in the legislature.

27 September 2013

Syria ordered to destroy chemical weapons

The U.N. Security Council orders Syria to account for and destroy its chemical weapons stockpile, following a surprise agreement between Washington and Moscow, averting U.S. strikes. The Security Council threatens to authorize the use of force in the event of non-compliance.

14 October 2013

Syria becomes a signatory to the Chemical Weapons Convention, prohibiting it from producing, stockpiling or using chemical weapons.

23 June 2014

The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons says it has removed the last of the Syrian government's chemical weapons. Syrian opposition officials maintain that the government's stocks were not fully accounted for, and that it retained supplies.

23 September 2014

U.S. airstrikes target IS

The U.S. launches airstrikes on Islamic State group targets in Syria.

07 August 2015

Reports of chlorine gas attacks

The U.N. Security Council authorizes the OPCW and U.N. investigators to probe reports of chemical weapons use in Syria, as reports circulate of repeated chlorine gas attacks by government forces against civilians in opposition-held areas. Chlorine gas, though not as toxic as nerve agents, can be classified as a chemical weapon depending on its use.

24 August 2016

Syrian government held responsible

The joint OPCW-U.N. panel determines the Syrian government twice used helicopters to deploy chlorine gas against its opponents, in civilian areas in the northern Idlib province. A later report holds the government responsible for a third attack. The attacks occurred in 2014 and 2015. The panel also finds that the Islamic State group used mustard gas.

28 February 2017

Russia, China stand with Syria

Russia, a stalwart ally of the Syrian government, and China veto a U.N. Security Council resolution authorizing sanctions against the Syrian government for chemical weapons use.

04 April 2017

Trump rebukes Assad

President Donald Trump issues a statement saying that the "heinous" actions of Assad's government are the direct result of Obama administration's "weakness and irresolution."

04 April 2017

Nerve gas attack kills dozens

At least 58 people are killed in what doctors say could be a nerve gas attack on the town of Khan Sheikhoun in the rebel-held Idlib province. Victims show signs of suffocation, convulsions, foaming at the mouth and pupil constriction. Witnesses say the attack was carried out by either Russian or Syrian Sukhoi jets. Moscow and Damascus deny responsibility.

05 April 2017

Trump says Assad's government has "crossed a lot of lines" with the suspected chemical attack in Syria.

06 April 2017

U.S. fires missiles into Syria

The U.S. fired a barrage of cruise missiles into Syria Thursday night in retaliation for this week's gruesome chemical weapons attack against civilians, U.S. officials said. It was the first direct American assault on the Syrian government and Trump's most dramatic military order since becoming president. Trump said strike on Syria in the "vital national security interest" of the United States.

Russia’s response

The Kremlin said President Vladimir Putin believes the U.S. strike is an “aggression against a sovereign state in violation of international law.” Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Putin believes the U.S. launched the strikes under a “far-fetched pretext.”

“Washington’s move deals a significant blow to the Russia-U.S. relations, which are already in a deplorable shape,” Peskov said. He added that the attack creates a “serious obstacle” for creating an international coalition against terrorism.

In the aftermath of the attack, Russia announced it would suspend the “deconfliction line” — the same information-sharing line the U.S. used to warn Russia about the attack ahead of time. It’s the first time the line has been severed. Russia still has several dozen warplanes and batteries of air defense missiles at its base near Latakia, Syria.

A Syrian child receives treatment after an alleged chemical attack at a field hospital in Saraqib, in Idlib province in northern Syria, on Tuesday, April 4, 2017. EPA photo.

What’s next for U.S.-Russia relations

Lt. Col. Michelle L. Baldanza, a Pentagon spokeswoman, said the U.S. military wants to continue to talk to Russia. “It is to the benefit of all parties operating in the air over Syria to avoid accidents and miscalculation, and we hope the Russian Ministry of Defense comes to this conclusion as well,” Baldanza said.

The U.S. maintains radar coverage and has other surveillance means to know who is in the air. However, ending the cooperation will mean U.S. and coalition pilots will be flying into Syrian airspace not knowing if Russian forces plan their own operations in the same places. Airwars, a nonprofit monitoring airstrikes in the war against the Islamic State group, noted that U.S.-led attacks typically focus on areas away from Russian activity, though ending the cooperation represents “a worrying development.”

What’s next in Syria?

The bombing represents Trump’s most dramatic military order since taking office and thrusts the U.S. administration deeper into the complex Syrian conflict. The Obama administration threatened to attack Assad’s forces after previous chemical attacks, but never followed through.

The U.S. had initially focused on diplomatic efforts, pressing the U.N. Security Council to adopt a resolution to condemn Syria’s suspected use of chemical weapons. But the vote was canceled because of differences among the 15 members.

The Security Council plans to meet Friday morning for a briefing on the U.S. strike.

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said before the airstrike Thursday afternoon that Assad should no longer have a role in governing the Syrian people and the U.S. is evaluating an appropriate response.

Response from around the world

World leaders rallied around the United States after it launched a missile strike. Saudi Arabia and Turkey, which support the Syrian opposition, welcomed the missile strike, with Riyadh calling it a “courageous decision” by Trump. Iran called it a “dangerous” unilateral action that would “strengthen terrorists” and further complicate the conflict.

The British government says it was informed in advance about the strike and firmly supports the American action.

Prime Minister Theresa May’s office says the action was “an appropriate response to the barbaric chemical weapons attack launched by the Syrian regime, and is intended to deter further attacks.” France, Italy and Israel also welcomed the strikes.

A measured response from U.S. politicians

Amid measured support for the U.S. cruise missile attack on a Syrian air base, some vocal Republicans and Democrats reprimanded the White House for launching the strike without first getting congressional approval.

The politically diverse group ranges from the libertarian-leaning Kentucky GOP Rep. Tom Massie to Sen. Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat and Hillary Clinton’s running mate in 2016. They’ve told Trump the U.S. Constitution gives Congress sole power to declare war and said the president needs to convince them that they should.

What Syrian civilians have said so far

A survivor of the chemical attack on Khan Sheikhoun told the AP he hopes the U.S. missile attack puts an end to government airstrikes, creating a safe area for civilians.

Alaa Alyousef, a 27-year old resident of Khan Sheikhoun, said the U.S. missile attack “alleviates a small part of our suffering,” but he said he worried it would be an “anesthetic” that numbs their pain and saves face for the international community.

“What good is a strike on Shayrat air base alone while we have more than 15 other air bases,” he said. Alyousef lost at least 25 relatives in the chemical attack.

Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings: How We Got to the Nuclear Option

WASHINGTON – Senate Democrats blocked Donald Trump’s Supreme Court appointee Neil Gorsuch Thursday, setting up a showdown with Republicans so intent on confirming him that they have threatened to change Senate rules in what’s called the “nuclear option.”

After that vote, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Thursday triggered the “nuclear option” to change long-standing rules to confirm Donald Trump’s Supreme Court appointee Neil Gorsuch after Democrats successfully filibustered his nomination.

The Senate’s decision to effectively end its members’ ability to block a high court nomination with a filibuster will have long-term impact by heightening partisanship and politicization of both the Senate and the Supreme Court, lawmakers and experts said.

Keep scrolling for a guide to the steps they are taking, and what is at stake; or click here for today’s full story.

Credit: AP

What you need to know about the filibuster

What is a filibuster?

Named after the Dutch word meaning “pirate,” the term describes how senators can hold the floor for unlimited debate to block legislation or, in this case, a Supreme Court nomination. It is not in the Constitution, but in Senate rules. The minority party uses it to block or shape the majority’s legislative agenda.

Why does the Senate allow filibusters?

It is a distinctive feature of the Senate, allowing its members the right to take to the floor and speak as long as he or she wishes — as dramatized by actor Jimmy Stewart in the 1939 film “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.” In contrast, the House is run by majority rule, and the leaders of the majority control what happens on the floor.

Why are Democrats threatening a filibuster of Gorsuch?

Schumer said Gorsuch is too conservative and out of the mainstream. Democrats also remain angry that McConnell ignored President Barack Obama’s nominee, Judge Merrick Garland, to hold open the vacancy left by Justice Antonin Scalia, who died in February 2016.

Why are Republicans digging in to confirm Gorsuch?

McConnell said Gorsuch is highly qualified and deserves to be confirmed. McConnell also said the vacancy occurred during a presidential election and voters chose Trump as president, so he gets to pick Scalia’s replacement.

How can a filibuster be stopped?

The majority presents a motion under the cloture rule that allows 30 hours of debate before a vote to end the filibuster. It takes three fifths of the Senate, or 60 votes, to end a filibuster. McConnell made a motion to end the Gorsuch filibuster Tuesday evening, setting the stage for a vote Thursday. Republicans have 52 votes, Democrats 48.

Has a Supreme Court nominee been filibustered before?

In 1968, a bipartisan group threatened a filibuster when President Lyndon Johnson named Abe Fortas as chief justice. A cloture vote failed and Johnson withdrew the nomination. In 2006, some Senate Democrats tried to filibuster the nominee Samuel Alito, but the Senate defeated it in a bipartisan 72-25 vote.

What you need to know about the nuclear option

What is the nuclear option?

It is a change in the Senate rules to lower the threshold of votes needed to end filibusters of Supreme Court nominees from its current 60 to a simple majority of 51. This is done through a series of motions, points of order and votes over the objection of the minority party.

Why is it called a nuclear option?

It is explosive act in what is supposed to be a calm, deliberative body. Many senators say this tactic will create fallout that will stoke acrimony, erode the long-standing senatorial privilege of debate and make the upper chamber increasingly like the majority-rule House. It also means that presidents won’t need a bipartisan majority to approve their Supreme Court nominees, tempting them to select justices even more aligned with their ideology or politics.

Why does McConnell think the nuclear option is needed?

McConnell said he doesn’t seem to have the 60 votes needed to end the filibuster.

Gorsuch met with Sen. Chuck Schumer on Feb. 7, 2017. Getty Images photo.

Has the nuclear option been used before?

In 2013, the Democratic majority acted after the Republican minority filibustered many of Obama’s nominees — changing Senate rules to cut off debate with 51 votes for presidential appointments with one exception: the lifetime appointments to the Supreme Court.

Are Schumer and McConnell seeking a compromise to avoid the nuclear option?

Schumer proposed Wednesday that Trump consult with members of both parties and try to come up with a consensus nominee who could meet the 60-vote threshold. But neither McConnell nor the White House took him up on the offer. McConnell said, “I hope Democrats reevaluate their position before the important vote we’ll take tomorrow.”

Where does the vote now stand?

Schumer said he has 41 Democratic votes, enough to filibuster Gorsuch, though three Democrats said they will vote for him. McConnell said he has the 51 votes necessary to trigger the nuclear option.

Get the latest on the confirmation hearings here.

Did Trump’s speech meet your expectations?

President Donald Trump delivered his first speech to Congress on Tuesday, Feb. 28, 2017, where he addressed overhauling health care, increasing defense spending and investing $1 trillion in infrastructure upgrades. If you’re a Trump supporter, did he say anything that surprised you or that you did not like? Or if you’re not a Trump supporter, did he say anything that changed your mind or that you liked?

Tell us

Thank you for your submission. Check back soon to see if it was posted.

Please respond in 250 words or less. If you want your response to be published, please provide your full name and community. Your response becomes the property of Newsday Media Group. It will be edited and may be republished in all media.

Is Trump’s travel order good for America?

President Donald Trump signed a new version of his travel ban that:

– Bars new visas for citizens from six Muslim-majority countries. The revised travel order leaves Iraq off the list of banned countries but still affects would-be visitors from Iran, Syria, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen and Libya.

– Specifies that a 90-day ban on people from the six countries does not apply to those who already have valid visas or people with U.S. green cards.

– Shuts down the U.S. refugee program for 120 days.

– Religious minorities from those six countries, such as Christians, will not be prioritized.

Do you think the new travel order will be good for America?

Tell us

Thank you for your submission. Check back soon to see if it was posted.

Please respond in 250 words or less. If you want your response to be published, please provide your full name and community. Your response becomes the property of Newsday Media Group. It will be edited and may be republished in all media.

How do you think President Trump is doing?

Since President Donald Trump took office on Jan. 20, 2017, each day of his administration has brought a torrent of headlines.

Numerous executive actions, polarized hearings for key Cabinet nominees and the abrupt resignation of Michael Flynn as national security adviser have been seized upon by critics as examples of a White House in disarray. Supporters and Trump say the news media is focusing on the negative and misrepresenting examples of him delivering on his campaign promises.

What do you think has been the president’s biggest success? Biggest failure? If you’re a Trump supporter, is there something that would make you withdraw your support? If you oppose him, is there something that would make you become a supporter?

Tell us

Thank you for your submission. Check back soon to see if it was posted.

Please respond in 250 words or less. If you want your response to be published, please provide your full name and community. Your response becomes the property of Newsday Media Group. It will be edited and may be republished in all media.

Donald Trump’s inauguration

The 45th president

Donald Trump’s inauguration

Donald Trump was inaugurated as the 45th president of the United States on Jan. 20, 2017.

As he was sworn into the nation’s highest office, the Republican billionaire businessman completed a journey that began in Trump Tower in June 2015, and ushered in a new era in American politics.

Confrontational and provocative, Trump triumphed in the most contentious presidential campaign in recent memory. He took the same approach during the transition period, while promising great change for the country.

Trump's inaugural address: Now it's 'America first'

'The time for action'

Trump's inaugural address: Now it's 'America first'

President Trump echoed the populist and protectionist message that propelled his unexpected victory and promised to restore American jobs and greatness.

AP / Patrick Semansky

See a spectator’s view of the moment

360 view

See a spectator’s view of the moment

Get at the center of the action with a 360-degree video experience as Donald Trump takes the oath of office to become president.

Newsday / William Perlman

Editorial: Trump's clear, chilling speech

Stark words

Editorial: Trump's clear, chilling speech

The president's inaugural address was direct, stated clearly his vision, and laid out his goals. But he once again painted a dystopian vision of the country.

AFP / Getty Images / Timothy A. Clary

Photos: Trump's inauguration ceremonies

Capturing the day

Photos: Trump's inauguration ceremonies

See photos of President Donald Trump and his family — including Melania, Barron, Ivanka and more — as they attended inauguration day events.

AP / Andrew Harnik

5 key issues Donald Trump is likely to face

What's next

5 key issues Donald Trump is likely to face

Trump has promised to bring jobs back from overseas, destroy ISIS and build a wall on the Mexican border, but he'll face obstacles.

AP

Protesters, police clash during inauguration

On the streets

Protesters, police clash during inauguration

Tens of thousands of protesters demonstrated against the rise of the 45th president with flashes of violence mixed with anger and frustration.

AP / Jose Luis Magana

Noteworthy tweets as president-elect

Making news

Noteworthy tweets as president-elect

See Donald Trump's noteworthy tweets since his election as the 45th president of the United States.

Getty Images / Drew Angerer

Behind the scenes of Trump's inauguration

Different views

Behind the scenes of Trump's inauguration

Take a look behind the scenes as Washington commemorated the inauguration.

AP / Alex Brandon

A look at Trump's picks for Cabinet, top jobs

Assembling his team

A look at Trump's picks for Cabinet, top jobs

His picks and possible choices for top posts are an eclectic mix of early backers of his campaign, business execs and conservative activists.

Getty Images / Alex Wong

Editorial: Trump still a president-in-waiting

A freewheeling show

Editorial: Trump still a president-in-waiting

Donald Trump’s first news conference as president-elect was bound to be highly anticipated, unusual and chaotic. It was all three.

Getty Images / Spencer Platt

The most controversial Trump campaign quotes

What he's said

The most controversial Trump campaign quotes

Donald Trump was an unusual candidate from Day 1. See one controversial quote from each month of his presidential campaign.

EPA / Jim Lo Scalzo

Cartoonists size up Trump

Drawing DJT

Cartoonists size up Trump

A collection of cartoons on the incoming 45th president.

The Indianapolis Star / Gary Varvel

From baby boy to TV celebrity

The early years

From baby boy to TV celebrity

See photos from Donald Trump's early years.

Donald Trump via Facebook

Who voted for Trump like Long Island did?

Breaking down the vote

Who voted for Trump like Long Island did?

Nassau and Suffolk voted for Trump in higher margins than any of the U.S. counties closest in size.

Getty Images / Tom Pennington

What 20 billionaires say about Trump

High-flying views

What 20 billionaires say about Trump

Warren Buffett, Peter Thiel and others sound off on Donald Trump.

Getty Images / Mark Wilson

President Trump inauguration 360 parade

Politics

360 View: Donald Trump’s inaugural parade

Get a spectator’s view of President Donald Trump’s inaugural parade.

Alt Video TextPlay 360° Video

Newsday puts you at the center of the action with a YouTube 360-degree video experience of Women’s March taking place the day after President Donald Trump inaugaration. Look around by dragging your mouse on your computer, swiping your mobile screen or tilting your mobile device right, left, up or down. (Credit: Newsday / William Perlman)

Note: On mobile devices, the 360-degree video experience can be viewed only in the YouTube app.

More News

Behind the scenes of Trump’s inauguration

See how Washington is preparing for the president’s swearing-in ceremony.

What Donald Trump needs to do in his inaugural address

President Donald Trump will take the oath of office on the steps of the Capitol shortly before noon.

How do you feel about Trump’s inauguration?

Share your thoughts. Are you hopeful or fearful? Engaged by politics or turned away?

5 key issues Donald Trump is likely to face

The President has promised to bring jobs back, destroy ISIS and build a wall on the Southern border with Mexico.