TODAY'S PAPER
17° Good Morning
17° Good Morning

A guide to spotting fake news

In mid-October, Eric Trump tweeted an article about a man who claimed the Clinton campaign paid him to protest at a rally for Donald Trump in Arizona. The article was from the website “abcnews.com.co” – with “ABC News” displayed prominently on its homepage.

But ABC News did not report that story. The story shared by Eric Trump to his more than 600,000 Twitter followers was false, and from a known fake-news website.

Incidents like these have become more commonplace, according to Richard Hornik, a lecturer at Stony Brook University’s Center for News Literacy. With so much information available to readers online, it’s now more difficult than ever to discern what’s reliable and what isn’t.

“The internet and social media has given everyone the capability to publish information,” Hornik said. “That’s empowered a lot of people, but that also carries with it great problems, and those problems have become more prevalent especially in the most recent election.”

Keep scrolling for advice on spotting fake or unreliable news sources. Clicking on the dots will reveal tips related to actual fake stories found on websites and social media.

1 1Watch out for websites that end in “.com.co” as they are often fake versions of real news sources. In this example, the entire site is branded as ABC News, a real news agency, but the URL is different. 2 2Check the “About Us” tab on websites for more information about the source. The contact page on this site shows a small building in Kansas and a description about the site and its founder uses language that would not be published by a veritable news organization. 3 3If a story makes you “really angry,” that can be a tactic used by a fake news organization to generate shares and ad revenue, wrote Melissa Zimdars, an associate professor of communications at Merrimack College.

Check your biases

“Most of us would prefer to look at news that confirms something we already believe,” Hornik said. That’s what makes getting information strictly from your social media feeds so perilous, he added. On Facebook you’re more likely to see posts and updates from likeminded people, creating an “echo chamber” in which most of the information shared and discussed is ideologically congruent with your beliefs, Hornik said.

To escape the echo chamber, experts recommend consuming information from a diverse array of sources.

“It’s always best to read multiple sources of information to get a variety of viewpoints and media frames,” Melissa Zimdars, an associate professor of communications at Merrimack College, wrote in a widely circulated list of unreliable media sources to avoid.

The image below is a screenshot of the fake story on Trump protesters from abc.com.co.

1 1If you’re skeptical of a story, try looking up someone quoted in the story. Not everyone is listed publicly, but most people have some kind of information about themselves on the internet. If you search for Paul Horner, of Arizona, it’s instantly clear that he’s actually a writer of fake news and not a legitimate source for this story. 2 2Be cognizant of opinions that are presented as facts. Even if an opinion appears as a quote, it should be supported by facts in the article. 3 3If an image is the evidence on which an entire story is based, you can often verify whether it is fake through programs like Google Image search and Tineye.com.

If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is

“If something seems too weird, too funny, too perfect, take a step back and ask yourself could this really be right?” Hornik said, referring to a doctored picture of what appeared to be sharks swimming in the New York Stock Exchange that went viral after superstorm Sandy hit.

If you come across something that could be a hoax, Hornik suggests utilizing fact-checking websites like Politifact or Snopes, a site that recently tracked down the source of a rumor that 3 million noncitizens voted illegally during the election.

There are also several websites that can help you determine if an image is fake, such as Google Image search and Tineye.com.

1 1If you only like Facebook pages that are in line with your views or only follow likeminded people, that creates a Facebook “echo chamber,” in which you’re missing out on alternative perspectives. 2 2Language like “shocking” and “unprecedented” should make you take a more critical look at the facts of the story and the trustworthiness of the publication. Some fake websites use “distorted headlines and decontextualized or dubious information in order to generate likes, shares, and profits,” Zimdars wrote. 3 3Remember that when you spot something that has been shared on social media, you need to analyze both sources — the person or group that shared and the publisher. 4 4Just because something has been shared thousands of times does not make it true. Hornik also warns about stories that show up at the top of search engine results — the ranking does not equate to reliability.

“Rank does not equal reliability”

Even though a story may appear high in a list of Google search results, it may not be a dependable source, Hornik said.

For instance, Hornik notes that the sixth result in a Google search of “Martin Luther King Jr.” is a website whose homepage links to stories such as “Why the King Holiday Should be Repealed!” and “Black Invention Myths.”

The site is hosted by Stormfront, a white supremacist group.

“Don’t trust information from strangers”

If you see a questionable news story or headline, experts recommend checking out the social media accounts or websites that posted the information, and see whether there’s a listed author.

Check the “About Us” tab on suspect websites, do a quick Wikipedia search, or search on Snopes.com.

“If information is reliable, it shouldn’t be difficult to figure out who the author is. As I always tell my students, ‘Children are always told not to take candy from strangers, and you shouldn’t take information from strangers,’”Hornik said.

1 1Sites with reputable-sounding names can still post misleading headlines and stories, even alongside real news. Make sure to compare stories from very left- or right-leaning websites and blogs with other well-known news sources. 2 2Look for the name of the story’s author. “Lack of author attribution may, but not always, signify that the news story is suspect and requires verification,” Zimdars wrote. 3 3If a story is based on reporting by another news source, click on the link to that story. Check to see how well the two stories – and their headlines – line up.

Was that photo taken out of context?

Reporting real photos and videos out of context has become common practice for some hyperpartisan websites, Hornik notes.

In April, Occupy Democrats posted a video that allegedly showed police in North Carolina removing a woman from a bathroom for not looking feminine enough. The post went viral during the “bathroom bill” controversy, which aimed to block transgender individuals from using the public bathrooms of the sex with which they identify.

But Snopes.com found the same video was posted to Facebook in 2015, and there was no evidence that it was shot in North Carolina.

1 1A quick way to fact check stories that are based on photos or videos is to check for dates, said Hornik, who added that hoax sites commonly recycle old photos and present them out of context. In this video, the recycled footage of a woman being thrown out of a bathroom is not dated and turned out to be old.

New York leads in rate of Zika infections

New York State has the highest rate of Zika infections in the nation, with 883 cases or 11.23 for every 250,000 residents, according to figures released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Florida ranks second, with 10.83 cases for every 250,000 residents. The two states also rank first and second in total number of cases. In Florida. there were 139 locally acquired cases, which no other state is reporting. You can read about local companies in the Zika fight. This data in the map and table below represent the count as of Wednesday, Nov. 2, 2016.

Zika rates by state, from Centers for Disease Control

Hover over any state to see the number of cases per 100,000 residents.

0 to 11 to 22-44-99+

StatesTotal casesRate per 250,000 residentsTravel-related casesTravel cases as % of nationLocally acquired cased
Alabama281.452810
Alaska00.00000
Arizona421.584210
Arkansas131.1013<10
California3122.0331280
Colorado462.184610
Connecticut584.035810
Delaware164.3216<10
District of Columbia259.672510
Florida*84710.8370818139
Georgia962.409620
Hawaii142.4914<10
Idaho40.624<10
Illinois761.477620
Indiana451.714510
Iowa171.3817<10
Kansas171.4717<10
Kentucky241.372410
Louisiana341.843410
Maine112.0711<10
Maryland1074.5110730
Massachusetts973.629720
Michigan621.576220
Minnesota532.445310
Mississippi231.922310
Missouri341.413410
Montana71.727<10
Nebraska121.6112<10
Nevada151.3415<10
New Hampshire112.0811<10
New Jersey1343.7613430
New Mexico91.089<10
New York88311.23883220
North Carolina731.857320
North Dakota20.692<10
Ohio691.496920
Oklahoma291.882910
Oregon332.103310
Pennsylvania**1472.8814740
Rhode Island337.853310
South Carolina532.775310
South Dakota20.592<10
Tennessee542.085410
Texas2372.2423760
Utah***151.2915<10
Vermont103.9910<10
Virginia902.729020
Washington531.905310
West Virginia111.4811<10
Wisconsin431.874310
Wyoming20.862<10

* Includes 139 locally acquired cases. **One additional case acquired through laboratory transmission. ***Includes one case with unknown route of person-to-person transmission.

Solid waste and recycling on Long Island

Long Island produces about 2.4 million tons of solid waste in a year and recycles about 654,000 tons of it, which works out to a rate of 27.1 percent, according to the most recent data provided by cities and towns. That rate can vary by town. For example, tiny Shelter Island reports recycling 73.4 percent of its solid waste, while the city of Long Beach reports recycling 11.2 percent.

The towns and cities have to report waste and recycling data to the state, and the data in these charts and tables come from the most recent reports, for 2015, except for Babylon, North Hempstead, Oyster Bay and Shelter Island. Those four places last filed reports for 2014 and we used that data here. Obviously towns with larger populations, such as Hempstead or Babylon, will have larger overall numbers than smaller towns. This data, compiled by Newsday reporter Ann Choi, was posted on March 22, 2017. Source: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Tons of recycled and unrecycled waste

Tons of recycled and unrecycled waste in the big towns

And tons of recycled and unrecycled waste in the smaller towns

Because they have smaller populations they produce less waste overall. (Note the different scale from the chart above.)

How much recycling per person

Another way to gauge recycling is to look at the number of pounds of solid waste that are recycled per resident. Here are the figures for Long Island towns (Fishers Island reports separately from Southold Town).


Here are the statistics from the four most recent sets of reports from the cities and towns to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.


2015Recyclable recovered (tons)Waste Streams (tons)TotalRecycled rate
Babylon NA NA NA NA
Brookhaven 78,184.82 171,786.35 249,971.17 31.3%
East Hampton 7,370.93 16,771.15 24,142.08 30.5%
Fisher Island 201.40 396.00 597.40 33.7%
Glen Cove 5,952.05 14,794.83 20,746.88 28.7%
Hempstead 104,861.00 528,561.00 633,422.00 16.6%
Huntington 25,068.20 106,522.00 131,590.20 19.1%
Islip 57,480.00 239,667.00 297,147.00 19.3%
Long Beach 2,449.63 19,407.27 21,856.90 11.2%
North Hempstead NA NA NA NA
Oyster Bay NA NA NA NA
Riverhead 4,753 15,097 19,849.17 23.9%
Shelter Island NA NA NA NA
Smithtown 43,892.24 105,448.67 149,340.91 29.4%
Southampton 3,978.66 5,883.90 9,862.56 40.3%
Southold 13,948.00 11,825.00 25,773.00 54.1%

2014Recyclable recovered (tons)Waste Streams (tons)TotalRecycled rate
Babylon 196,670.00 236,788.00 433,458.00 45.4%
Brookhaven 115,109.61 173,500.70 288,610.31 39.9%
East Hampton 7,803.48 NA NA NA
Fisher Island 315.00 385.00 700.00 45.0%
Glen Cove NA NA NA NA
Hempstead 97,988.00 401,679.00 499,667.00 19.6%
Huntington 36,793.00 109,443.00 146,236.00 25.2%
Islip 57,972.00 226,125.00 284,097.00 20.4%
Long Beach 2,065.69 24,302.88 26,368.57 7.8%
North Hempstead 46,562.01 166,756.00 213,318.01 21.8%
Oyster Bay 58,640.01 116,441.50 175,081.51 33.5%
Riverhead NA NA NA NA
Shelter Island 4,438.64 1,605.15 6,043.79 73.4%
Smithtown39445.3106265.28 145,710.58 27.1%
Southampton 4,121.17 6,953.51 11,074.68 37.2%
Southold 14,510.00 19,037.00 33,547.00 43.3%

2013Recyclable recovered (tons)Waste Streams (tons)TotalRecycled rate
Babylon 71,274.00 237,207.00 308,481.00 23.1%
Brookhaven 88,271.82 172,484.88 260,756.70 33.9%
East Hampton 9,104.13 NA NA NA
Fisher Island 347.00 353.00 700.00 49.6%
Glen Cove 4,627.43 15,191.69 19,819.12 23.3%
Hempstead 125,908.00 461,025.00 586,933.00 21.5%
Huntington 35,966.00 111,841.00 147,807.00 24.3%
Islip 51,378.00 227,185.00 278,563.00 18.4%
Long Beach 16,824.22 24,816.69 41,640.91 40.4%
North Hempstead 63,820.55 188,240.80 252,061.35 25.3%
Oyster Bay 59,184.15 114,809.60 173,993.75 34.0%
Riverhead3711.3916032 19,743.39 18.8%
Shelter Island4566.08 1,792.97 6,316.27 72.3%
Smithtown 34,977.66 105,693.27 140,670.93 24.9%
Southampton NA NA NA  
Southold 14,463.00 18,950.00 33,413.00 43.3%

2009Recyclable recovered (tons)Waste Streams (tons)TotalRecycled rate
Babylon 42,109 237,587.00 279,696.00 15.1%
Brookhaven 85,730 201,820.00 287,550.00 29.8%
East Hampton 7,760 21,822.00 29,582.00 26.2%
Fisher Island NA NA NA NA
Glen Cove 11,408 51,775.00 63,183.00 18.1%
Hempstead 159,816 544,540.00 704,356.00 22.7%
Huntington 40,351 110,841.00 151,192.00 26.7%
Islip 71,757 172,383.00 244,140.00 29.4%
Long Beach 3,064 20,758.00 23,822.00 12.9%
North Hempstead 35,964 135,769.00 171,733.00 20.9%
Oyster Bay 20,085 142,531.00 162,616.00 12.4%
Riverhead 1,835 16,987.00 18,822.00 9.7%
Shelter Island 1,693 995.00 2,688.00 63.0%
Smithtown 34,064 107,727.00 141,791.00 24.0%
Southampton 30,255 5,441.00 35,696.00 84.8%
Southold 12,199 9,979.00 22,178.00 55.0%

The charts above were made via amCharts.com.

2013 Southold Payroll

2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014

2013SOUTHOLDPAYROLLS

ABOUT

About

The 15 towns and cities on Long Island employ more than 20,000 full-time, part-time and seasonal workers. Here are their records for employees paid in 2013. Some towns could not provide a base pay for hourly workers. In some of those cases, an hourly pay rate is listed instead. The difference between base pay and total pay can be accounted for by many factors besides overtime, including shift differential, or payouts for unused vacation or sick time. Retiring workers may have received substantial payouts. Not all municipalities reported retirement or termination dates for all employees.

In some cases, a worker’s total pay may be less than the base pay because the worker did not work the whole year, taking an unpaid leave, for example. Some municipalities had names repeated. Unless the worker had the same title in the same department, those repetitions are listed here.

Payroll information was gathered under the state’s Freedom of Information Law by reporters Aisha Al-Muslim, Carl MacGowan, Lauren Harrison, Mackenzie Issler, Mitch Freedman, Nicholas Spangler, Patrick Whittle, Sarah Armaghan, Scott Eidler, Ted Phillips, with additional assistance from Caitlin Rondino and Lauren DelValle.

Click through the charts below for a town-to-town comparison. You can also select the full list for any municipality, and you can re-sort any list by clicking on column headings.

2013 Southampton Payroll

2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014

2013SOUTHAMPTONPAYROLLS

ABOUT

About

The 15 towns and cities on Long Island employ more than 20,000 full-time, part-time and seasonal workers. Here are their records for employees paid in 2013. Some towns could not provide a base pay for hourly workers. In some of those cases, an hourly pay rate is listed instead. The difference between base pay and total pay can be accounted for by many factors besides overtime, including shift differential, or payouts for unused vacation or sick time. Retiring workers may have received substantial payouts. Not all municipalities reported retirement or termination dates for all employees.

In some cases, a worker’s total pay may be less than the base pay because the worker did not work the whole year, taking an unpaid leave, for example. Some municipalities had names repeated. Unless the worker had the same title in the same department, those repetitions are listed here.

Payroll information was gathered under the state’s Freedom of Information Law by reporters Aisha Al-Muslim, Carl MacGowan, Lauren Harrison, Mackenzie Issler, Mitch Freedman, Nicholas Spangler, Patrick Whittle, Sarah Armaghan, Scott Eidler, Ted Phillips, with additional assistance from Caitlin Rondino and Lauren DelValle.

Click through the charts below for a town-to-town comparison. You can also select the full list for any municipality, and you can re-sort any list by clicking on column headings.

2013 Smithtown Payroll

2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014

2013SMITHTOWNPAYROLLS

ABOUT

About

The 15 towns and cities on Long Island employ more than 20,000 full-time, part-time and seasonal workers. Here are their records for employees paid in 2013. Some towns could not provide a base pay for hourly workers. In some of those cases, an hourly pay rate is listed instead. The difference between base pay and total pay can be accounted for by many factors besides overtime, including shift differential, or payouts for unused vacation or sick time. Retiring workers may have received substantial payouts. Not all municipalities reported retirement or termination dates for all employees.

In some cases, a worker’s total pay may be less than the base pay because the worker did not work the whole year, taking an unpaid leave, for example. Some municipalities had names repeated. Unless the worker had the same title in the same department, those repetitions are listed here.

Payroll information was gathered under the state’s Freedom of Information Law by reporters Aisha Al-Muslim, Carl MacGowan, Lauren Harrison, Mackenzie Issler, Mitch Freedman, Nicholas Spangler, Patrick Whittle, Sarah Armaghan, Scott Eidler, Ted Phillips, with additional assistance from Caitlin Rondino and Lauren DelValle.

Click through the charts below for a town-to-town comparison. You can also select the full list for any municipality, and you can re-sort any list by clicking on column headings.

2013 Shelter Island Payroll

2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014

2013SHELTER ISLANDPAYROLLS

ABOUT

About

The 15 towns and cities on Long Island employ more than 20,000 full-time, part-time and seasonal workers. Here are their records for employees paid in 2013. Some towns could not provide a base pay for hourly workers. In some of those cases, an hourly pay rate is listed instead. The difference between base pay and total pay can be accounted for by many factors besides overtime, including shift differential, or payouts for unused vacation or sick time. Retiring workers may have received substantial payouts. Not all municipalities reported retirement or termination dates for all employees.

In some cases, a worker’s total pay may be less than the base pay because the worker did not work the whole year, taking an unpaid leave, for example. Some municipalities had names repeated. Unless the worker had the same title in the same department, those repetitions are listed here.

Payroll information was gathered under the state’s Freedom of Information Law by reporters Aisha Al-Muslim, Carl MacGowan, Lauren Harrison, Mackenzie Issler, Mitch Freedman, Nicholas Spangler, Patrick Whittle, Sarah Armaghan, Scott Eidler, Ted Phillips, with additional assistance from Caitlin Rondino and Lauren DelValle.

Click through the charts below for a town-to-town comparison. You can also select the full list for any municipality, and you can re-sort any list by clicking on column headings.

2013 Riverhead Payroll

2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014

2013RIVERHEADPAYROLLS

ABOUT

About

The 15 towns and cities on Long Island employ more than 20,000 full-time, part-time and seasonal workers. Here are their records for employees paid in 2013. Some towns could not provide a base pay for hourly workers. In some of those cases, an hourly pay rate is listed instead. The difference between base pay and total pay can be accounted for by many factors besides overtime, including shift differential, or payouts for unused vacation or sick time. Retiring workers may have received substantial payouts. Not all municipalities reported retirement or termination dates for all employees.

In some cases, a worker’s total pay may be less than the base pay because the worker did not work the whole year, taking an unpaid leave, for example. Some municipalities had names repeated. Unless the worker had the same title in the same department, those repetitions are listed here.

Payroll information was gathered under the state’s Freedom of Information Law by reporters Aisha Al-Muslim, Carl MacGowan, Lauren Harrison, Mackenzie Issler, Mitch Freedman, Nicholas Spangler, Patrick Whittle, Sarah Armaghan, Scott Eidler, Ted Phillips, with additional assistance from Caitlin Rondino and Lauren DelValle.

Click through the charts below for a town-to-town comparison. You can also select the full list for any municipality, and you can re-sort any list by clicking on column headings.

2013 Oyster Bay Payroll

2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014

2013OYSTER BAYPAYROLLS

ABOUT

About

The 15 towns and cities on Long Island employ more than 20,000 full-time, part-time and seasonal workers. Here are their records for employees paid in 2013. Some towns could not provide a base pay for hourly workers. In some of those cases, an hourly pay rate is listed instead. The difference between base pay and total pay can be accounted for by many factors besides overtime, including shift differential, or payouts for unused vacation or sick time. Retiring workers may have received substantial payouts. Not all municipalities reported retirement or termination dates for all employees.

In some cases, a worker’s total pay may be less than the base pay because the worker did not work the whole year, taking an unpaid leave, for example. Some municipalities had names repeated. Unless the worker had the same title in the same department, those repetitions are listed here.

Payroll information was gathered under the state’s Freedom of Information Law by reporters Aisha Al-Muslim, Carl MacGowan, Lauren Harrison, Mackenzie Issler, Mitch Freedman, Nicholas Spangler, Patrick Whittle, Sarah Armaghan, Scott Eidler, Ted Phillips, with additional assistance from Caitlin Rondino and Lauren DelValle.

Click through the charts below for a town-to-town comparison. You can also select the full list for any municipality, and you can re-sort any list by clicking on column headings.

2013 North Hempstead Payroll

2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014

2013NORTH HEMPSTEADPAYROLLS

ABOUT

About

The 15 towns and cities on Long Island employ more than 20,000 full-time, part-time and seasonal workers. Here are their records for employees paid in 2013. Some towns could not provide a base pay for hourly workers. In some of those cases, an hourly pay rate is listed instead. The difference between base pay and total pay can be accounted for by many factors besides overtime, including shift differential, or payouts for unused vacation or sick time. Retiring workers may have received substantial payouts. Not all municipalities reported retirement or termination dates for all employees.

In some cases, a worker’s total pay may be less than the base pay because the worker did not work the whole year, taking an unpaid leave, for example. Some municipalities had names repeated. Unless the worker had the same title in the same department, those repetitions are listed here.

Payroll information was gathered under the state’s Freedom of Information Law by reporters Aisha Al-Muslim, Carl MacGowan, Lauren Harrison, Mackenzie Issler, Mitch Freedman, Nicholas Spangler, Patrick Whittle, Sarah Armaghan, Scott Eidler, Ted Phillips, with additional assistance from Caitlin Rondino and Lauren DelValle.

Click through the charts below for a town-to-town comparison. You can also select the full list for any municipality, and you can re-sort any list by clicking on column headings.