How common is your last name?

There were 162,253 last names recorded 100 times or more by the U.S. Census Bureau during their latest count in 2010. You can search through this database to see if your name is among them. The Census says that about 6.3 million surnames were recorded in 2010, with about 62 percent of them reported just once. If your name does not turn up in a search here there were fewer than 100 people reporting it in 2010. Names and data for the year 2000 are included for comparison so you can see if a name rose or fell in the rankings.

Also included are percentages listed for each name for the four largest ethnic groups: Non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks or African-American, Hispanics of any race, and non-Hispanic Asians, Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander. An "(S)" appears where the percentages were suppressed for confidentiality. If the name you are searching for is contained within other names, those names will show up in a search as well (we're working on that). Hyphenated names appear with out the hyphen, and names longer than 15 characters are truncated. To return to the original database after a search, hit “clear search.” This database was posted on Dec. 20, 2016, and you can read more about the Census data on names here.

Clear Search
name rank Number of people People Per 100,000 population year White percent Black percent Hispanic percent Asian percent
name ROZENBLAT rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 91.07% Black percent (S)% Hispanic percent 7.14% Asian percent 0.00%
name RONSTADT rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 64.88% Black percent (S)% Hispanic percent 32.14% Asian percent 0.00%
name ROSENBLAD rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 92.86% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent 4.17% Asian percent (S)%
name ROUSSEVE rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 38.10% Black percent 51.19% Hispanic percent 7.74% Asian percent 0.00%
name SEMLING rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 98.21% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent 0.00% Asian percent (S)%
name SEIGH rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 95.83% Black percent (S)% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent 0.00%
name SEYMER rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 96.43% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent 0.00%
name SEECH rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 97.02% Black percent (S)% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent 0.00%
name SETTANNI rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 98.21% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent 0.00% Asian percent (S)%
name SHERCK rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 97.62% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent 0.00%
name SHANON rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 63.69% Black percent 27.38% Hispanic percent 5.36% Asian percent 2.98%
name SHANDLEY rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 91.67% Black percent (S)% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent 0.00%
name SHIMANSKY rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 96.43% Black percent (S)% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent 0.00%
name SHAMPO rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 97.62% Black percent (S)% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent (S)%
name SCHINDELDECKER rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 99.40% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent (S)%
name SCHABES rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 96.43% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent 3.57% Asian percent 0.00%
name SCHWERT rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 99.40% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent 0.00%
name SAYO rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 7.14% Black percent 2.98% Hispanic percent 3.57% Asian percent 82.14%
name SCHIHL rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 97.62% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent 0.00%
name SCHECTMAN rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 94.64% Black percent (S)% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent 0.00%
name SCAFIDE rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 90.48% Black percent (S)% Hispanic percent 0.00% Asian percent (S)%
name SCHNACKER rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 97.02% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent (S)%
name SCEARCY rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 77.98% Black percent 8.33% Hispanic percent 5.95% Asian percent (S)%
name SCOON rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 60.12% Black percent 31.55% Hispanic percent 3.57% Asian percent 0.00%
name SATTIEWHITE rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 8.33% Black percent 85.71% Hispanic percent 2.98% Asian percent 0.00%
name SAURIOL rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 94.64% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent 2.98% Asian percent (S)%
name SANBERG rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 95.83% Black percent (S)% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent (S)%
name SAMPATHKUMAR rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent (S)% Black percent (S)% Hispanic percent 0.00% Asian percent 95.83%
name SAURAGE rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 95.24% Black percent (S)% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent (S)%
name SANSEVERE rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 98.21% Black percent (S)% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent 0.00%
name TATSUMI rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 10.71% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent 3.57% Asian percent 76.79%
name TARRIS rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 89.29% Black percent 6.55% Hispanic percent 2.98% Asian percent (S)%
name SUREN rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 35.12% Black percent (S)% Hispanic percent 48.81% Asian percent 13.10%
name SUNESARA rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent (S)% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent 97.62%
name SZYPULSKI rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 98.81% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent 0.00%
name SWADENER rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 76.79% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent 21.43% Asian percent (S)%
name SUBERO rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 10.71% Black percent 35.12% Hispanic percent 51.79% Asian percent (S)%
name SUBACH rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 97.62% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent (S)%
name SUCHOMSKI rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 96.43% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent (S)%
name TISHMAN rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 95.24% Black percent (S)% Hispanic percent 2.98% Asian percent (S)%
name TIMLICK rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 92.86% Black percent 3.57% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent 0.00%
name TOPPE rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 88.69% Black percent (S)% Hispanic percent 10.71% Asian percent (S)%
name TOCI rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 91.67% Black percent (S)% Hispanic percent 4.76% Asian percent (S)%
name TENNAPEL rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 95.83% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent 4.17% Asian percent 0.00%
name TERRENCE rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 53.57% Black percent 40.48% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent 0.00%
name TENREIRO rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 63.10% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent 34.52% Asian percent (S)%
name TERRIL rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 95.83% Black percent 2.98% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent (S)%
name TIKHONOV rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 99.40% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent (S)%
name TENTLER rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 98.21% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent (S)%
name STAGEBERG rank 106096 Number of people 168 People Per 100,000 population 0.06 year 2010 White percent 97.02% Black percent 0.00% Hispanic percent (S)% Asian percent (S)%

Please choose a filter above to display results or

DISPLAY ALL

No results for your selection

RESET
BACK TO TOP