{"id":807,"date":"2018-04-19T09:10:10","date_gmt":"2018-04-19T13:10:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dev.projects.newsday.com\/nmg-db\/"},"modified":"2019-03-13T18:17:06","modified_gmt":"2019-03-13T22:17:06","slug":"deficits","status":"publish","type":"database","link":"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/long-island\/deficits\/","title":{"rendered":"Deficit, debt rising in the Trump era"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"template":"","categories":[2],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v18.2.1 (Yoast SEO v18.4.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Deficit, debt rising in the Trump era - NMGDB - Newsday<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The size of the federal budget deficit will rise higher for the next eight years due to recent tax and spending legislation, crossing the $1 trillion mark by 2020.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1, noarchive\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/long-island\/deficits\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"New forecasts for higher deficits\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The size of the federal budget deficit will rise higher for the next eight years due to recent tax and spending legislation, crossing the $1 trillion mark by 2020 and adding to the overall national debt.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/database\/807\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Newsday\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-13T22:17:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"New forecasts for higher deficits\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"The size of the federal budget deficit will rise higher for the next eight years due to recent tax and spending legislation, crossing the $1 trillion mark by 2020 and adding to the overall national debt.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"http:\/\/prod-polopoly-index1:8080\/imageserver\/image\/6209604\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/\",\"name\":\"NMGDB\",\"description\":\"Just another ND Projects Sites site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/long-island\/deficits\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"\",\"contentUrl\":\"\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/long-island\/deficits\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/long-island\/deficits\/\",\"name\":\"Deficit, debt rising in the Trump era - NMGDB\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-04-19T13:10:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-13T22:17:06+00:00\",\"description\":\"The size of the federal budget deficit will rise higher for the next eight years due to recent tax and spending legislation, crossing the $1 trillion mark by 2020.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/long-island\/deficits\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/long-island\/deficits\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/long-island\/deficits\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Deficit, debt rising in the Trump era\"}]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Deficit, debt rising in the Trump era - NMGDB - Newsday","description":"The size of the federal budget deficit will rise higher for the next eight years due to recent tax and spending legislation, crossing the $1 trillion mark by 2020.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1","archive":"noarchive"},"canonical":"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/long-island\/deficits\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"New forecasts for higher deficits","og_description":"The size of the federal budget deficit will rise higher for the next eight years due to recent tax and spending legislation, crossing the $1 trillion mark by 2020 and adding to the overall national debt.","og_url":"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/database\/807","og_site_name":"Newsday","article_modified_time":"2019-03-13T22:17:06+00:00","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"New forecasts for higher deficits","twitter_description":"The size of the federal budget deficit will rise higher for the next eight years due to recent tax and spending legislation, crossing the $1 trillion mark by 2020 and adding to the overall national debt.","twitter_image":"http:\/\/prod-polopoly-index1:8080\/imageserver\/image\/6209604","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/#website","url":"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/","name":"NMGDB","description":"Just another ND Projects Sites site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/long-island\/deficits\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"","contentUrl":""},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/long-island\/deficits\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/long-island\/deficits\/","name":"Deficit, debt rising in the Trump era - NMGDB","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-04-19T13:10:10+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-13T22:17:06+00:00","description":"The size of the federal budget deficit will rise higher for the next eight years due to recent tax and spending legislation, crossing the $1 trillion mark by 2020.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/long-island\/deficits\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/long-island\/deficits\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/long-island\/deficits\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Deficit, debt rising in the Trump era"}]}]}},"index":{"id":807,"title":"Deficit, debt rising in the Trump era","__typename":"database","lead":"The size of the federal budget deficit will rise higher for the next eight years due to recent tax and spending legislation, crossing the $1 trillion mark by 2020.","body":"","publishedDate":1524129010000,"updatedDate":1552501026000,"url":"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/long-island\/deficits\/","headline":"Deficit, debt rising in the Trump era","teaserTitle":"Deficit, debt rising in the Trump era","newslabel":"none","newslabel2":"none","subType":"article","authors":["By \n                \n                \n              \n              April 19, 2018 9:10 AM"],"reviewStars":"","displayType":"","seoTitle":"","seoDescription":"","noIndex":false,"byline":null,"organization":"","premiumType":"inherit","fullImageTop":false,"desktopAdzone":null,"mobileAdzone":null,"videoAdzone":null,"mobileVideoAdzone":null,"chapterNav":"","sportsLink":"","updateTag":"","customCSS":null,"customJS":null,"teaserImage":null,"footer":null,"publishingInfo":{"contentId":"","__typename":"ADMPublishingInfo"},"parent":{"title":"long-island","__typename":"Section"},"tags":null,"location":[],"source":{"name":"","__typename":"Source"},"topElement":{"__typename":"Image","id":"","width":null,"height":null,"title":"","headline":"","baseUrl":"","caption":"","altTag":"","byline":"","organization":"","floatLeft":false,"floatRight":false,"useFreeform":false},"topMediaItem":null,"verticalMedia":null,"sortDate":1552501026000,"contentType":"article","lastIndexed":"","search_tags":[],"search_source":[],"search_section":["Data"],"search_community":[],"search_town":[],"_geoloc":[],"hasEmbeds":true,"objectID":"wp_14_807"},"table":{"columns":["year","revenue","outlays","on_budget_deficit","social_security","postal_service","total_deficit","debt_held_by_public"],"pages":1,"rows":50,"data":[{"year":{"formatted":"1968","raw":"1968"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$153.0","raw":"153.0"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$178.1","raw":"178.1"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-27.7","raw":"-27.7"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$2.6","raw":"2.6"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"n.a.","raw":"n.a."},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-25.2","raw":"-25.2"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$289.5","raw":"289.5"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1969","raw":"1969"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$186.9","raw":"186.9"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$183.6","raw":"183.6"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-0.5","raw":"-0.5"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$3.7","raw":"3.7"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"n.a.","raw":"n.a."},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$3.2","raw":"3.2"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$278.1","raw":"278.1"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1970","raw":"1970"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$192.8","raw":"192.8"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$195.6","raw":"195.6"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-8.7","raw":"-8.7"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$5.9","raw":"5.9"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"n.a.","raw":"n.a."},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-2.8","raw":"-2.8"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$283.2","raw":"283.2"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1971","raw":"1971"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$187.1","raw":"187.1"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$210.2","raw":"210.2"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-26.1","raw":"-26.1"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$3.0","raw":"3.0"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"n.a.","raw":"n.a."},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-23.0","raw":"-23.0"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$303.0","raw":"303.0"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1972","raw":"1972"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$207.3","raw":"207.3"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$230.7","raw":"230.7"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-26.1","raw":"-26.1"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$3.1","raw":"3.1"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-0.4","raw":"$-0.4"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-23.4","raw":"-23.4"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$322.4","raw":"322.4"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1973","raw":"1973"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$230.8","raw":"230.8"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$245.7","raw":"245.7"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-15.2","raw":"-15.2"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$0.5","raw":"0.5"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-0.2","raw":"$-0.2"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-14.9","raw":"-14.9"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$340.9","raw":"340.9"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1974","raw":"1974"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$263.2","raw":"263.2"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$269.4","raw":"269.4"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-7.2","raw":"-7.2"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$1.8","raw":"1.8"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-0.8","raw":"$-0.8"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-6.1","raw":"-6.1"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$343.7","raw":"343.7"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1975","raw":"1975"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$279.1","raw":"279.1"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$332.3","raw":"332.3"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-54.1","raw":"-54.1"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$2.0","raw":"2.0"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-1.1","raw":"$-1.1"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-53.2","raw":"-53.2"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$394.7","raw":"394.7"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1976","raw":"1976"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$298.1","raw":"298.1"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$371.8","raw":"371.8"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-69.4","raw":"-69.4"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$-3.2","raw":"-3.2"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-1.1","raw":"$-1.1"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-73.7","raw":"-73.7"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$477.4","raw":"477.4"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1977","raw":"1977"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$355.6","raw":"355.6"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$409.2","raw":"409.2"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-49.9","raw":"-49.9"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$-3.9","raw":"-3.9"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$0.2","raw":"$0.2"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-53.7","raw":"-53.7"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$549.1","raw":"549.1"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1978","raw":"1978"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$399.6","raw":"399.6"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$458.7","raw":"458.7"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-55.4","raw":"-55.4"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$-4.3","raw":"-4.3"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$0.5","raw":"$0.5"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-59.2","raw":"-59.2"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$607.1","raw":"607.1"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1979","raw":"1979"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$463.3","raw":"463.3"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$504.0","raw":"504.0"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-39.6","raw":"-39.6"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$-2.0","raw":"-2.0"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$0.9","raw":"$0.9"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-40.7","raw":"-40.7"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$640.3","raw":"640.3"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1980","raw":"1980"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$517.1","raw":"517.1"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$590.9","raw":"590.9"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-73.1","raw":"-73.1"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$-1.1","raw":"-1.1"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$0.4","raw":"$0.4"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-73.8","raw":"-73.8"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$711.9","raw":"711.9"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1981","raw":"1981"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$599.3","raw":"599.3"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$678.2","raw":"678.2"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-73.9","raw":"-73.9"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$-5.0","raw":"-5.0"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-0.1","raw":"$-0.1"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-79.0","raw":"-79.0"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$789.4","raw":"789.4"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1982","raw":"1982"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$617.8","raw":"617.8"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$745.7","raw":"745.7"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-120.6","raw":"-120.6"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$-7.9","raw":"-7.9"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$0.6","raw":"$0.6"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-128.0","raw":"-128.0"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$924.6","raw":"924.6"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1983","raw":"1983"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$600.6","raw":"600.6"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$808.4","raw":"808.4"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-207.7","raw":"-207.7"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$0.2","raw":"0.2"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-0.3","raw":"$-0.3"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-207.8","raw":"-207.8"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$1,137.3","raw":"1137.3"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1984","raw":"1984"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$666.4","raw":"666.4"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$851.8","raw":"851.8"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-185.3","raw":"-185.3"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$0.3","raw":"0.3"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-0.4","raw":"$-0.4"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-185.4","raw":"-185.4"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$1,307.0","raw":"1307.0"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1985","raw":"1985"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$734.0","raw":"734.0"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$946.3","raw":"946.3"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-221.5","raw":"-221.5"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$9.4","raw":"9.4"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-0.1","raw":"$-0.1"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-212.3","raw":"-212.3"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$1,507.3","raw":"1507.3"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1986","raw":"1986"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$769.2","raw":"769.2"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$990.4","raw":"990.4"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-237.9","raw":"-237.9"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$16.7","raw":"16.7"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"*","raw":"*"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-221.2","raw":"-221.2"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$1,740.6","raw":"1740.6"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1987","raw":"1987"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$854.3","raw":"854.3"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$1,004.0","raw":"1004.0"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-168.4","raw":"-168.4"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$19.6","raw":"19.6"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-0.9","raw":"$-0.9"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-149.7","raw":"-149.7"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$1,889.8","raw":"1889.8"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1988","raw":"1988"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$909.2","raw":"909.2"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$1,064.4","raw":"1064.4"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-192.3","raw":"-192.3"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$38.8","raw":"38.8"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-1.7","raw":"$-1.7"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-155.2","raw":"-155.2"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$2,051.6","raw":"2051.6"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1989","raw":"1989"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$991.1","raw":"991.1"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$1,143.7","raw":"1143.7"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-205.4","raw":"-205.4"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$52.4","raw":"52.4"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$0.3","raw":"$0.3"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-152.6","raw":"-152.6"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$2,190.7","raw":"2190.7"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1990","raw":"1990"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$1,032.0","raw":"1032.0"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$1,253.0","raw":"1253.0"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-277.6","raw":"-277.6"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$58.2","raw":"58.2"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-1.6","raw":"$-1.6"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-221.0","raw":"-221.0"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$2,411.6","raw":"2411.6"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1991","raw":"1991"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$1,055.0","raw":"1055.0"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$1,324.2","raw":"1324.2"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-321.4","raw":"-321.4"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$53.5","raw":"53.5"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-1.3","raw":"$-1.3"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-269.2","raw":"-269.2"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$2,689.0","raw":"2689.0"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1992","raw":"1992"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$1,091.2","raw":"1091.2"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$1,381.5","raw":"1381.5"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-340.4","raw":"-340.4"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$50.7","raw":"50.7"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-0.7","raw":"$-0.7"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-290.3","raw":"-290.3"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$2,999.7","raw":"2999.7"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1993","raw":"1993"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$1,154.3","raw":"1154.3"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$1,409.4","raw":"1409.4"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-300.4","raw":"-300.4"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$46.8","raw":"46.8"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-1.4","raw":"$-1.4"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-255.1","raw":"-255.1"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$3,248.4","raw":"3248.4"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1994","raw":"1994"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$1,258.6","raw":"1258.6"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$1,461.8","raw":"1461.8"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-258.8","raw":"-258.8"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$56.8","raw":"56.8"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-1.1","raw":"$-1.1"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-203.2","raw":"-203.2"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$3,433.1","raw":"3433.1"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1995","raw":"1995"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$1,351.8","raw":"1351.8"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$1,515.7","raw":"1515.7"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-226.4","raw":"-226.4"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$60.4","raw":"60.4"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$2.0","raw":"$2.0"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-164.0","raw":"-164.0"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$3,604.4","raw":"3604.4"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1996","raw":"1996"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$1,453.1","raw":"1453.1"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$1,560.5","raw":"1560.5"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-174.0","raw":"-174.0"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$66.4","raw":"66.4"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$0.2","raw":"$0.2"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-107.4","raw":"-107.4"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$3,734.1","raw":"3734.1"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1997","raw":"1997"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$1,579.2","raw":"1579.2"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$1,601.1","raw":"1601.1"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-103.2","raw":"-103.2"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$81.3","raw":"81.3"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"*","raw":"*"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-21.9","raw":"-21.9"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$3,772.3","raw":"3772.3"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1998","raw":"1998"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$1,721.7","raw":"1721.7"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$1,652.5","raw":"1652.5"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-29.9","raw":"-29.9"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$99.4","raw":"99.4"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-0.2","raw":"$-0.2"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$69.3","raw":"69.3"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$3,721.1","raw":"3721.1"}},{"year":{"formatted":"1999","raw":"1999"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$1,827.5","raw":"1827.5"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$1,701.8","raw":"1701.8"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$1.9","raw":"1.9"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$124.7","raw":"124.7"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-1.0","raw":"$-1.0"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$125.6","raw":"125.6"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$3,632.4","raw":"3632.4"}},{"year":{"formatted":"2000","raw":"2000"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$2,025.2","raw":"2025.2"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$1,789.0","raw":"1789.0"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$86.4","raw":"86.4"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$151.8","raw":"151.8"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-2.0","raw":"$-2.0"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$236.2","raw":"236.2"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$3,409.8","raw":"3409.8"}},{"year":{"formatted":"2001","raw":"2001"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$1,991.1","raw":"1991.1"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$1,862.8","raw":"1862.8"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-32.4","raw":"-32.4"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$163.0","raw":"163.0"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-2.3","raw":"$-2.3"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$128.2","raw":"128.2"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$3,319.6","raw":"3319.6"}},{"year":{"formatted":"2002","raw":"2002"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$1,853.1","raw":"1853.1"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$2,010.9","raw":"2010.9"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-317.4","raw":"-317.4"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$159.0","raw":"159.0"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$0.7","raw":"$0.7"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-157.8","raw":"-157.8"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$3,540.4","raw":"3540.4"}},{"year":{"formatted":"2003","raw":"2003"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$1,782.3","raw":"1782.3"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$2,159.9","raw":"2159.9"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-538.4","raw":"-538.4"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$155.6","raw":"155.6"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$5.2","raw":"$5.2"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-377.6","raw":"-377.6"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$3,913.4","raw":"3913.4"}},{"year":{"formatted":"2004","raw":"2004"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$1,880.1","raw":"1880.1"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$2,292.8","raw":"2292.8"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-568.0","raw":"-568.0"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$151.1","raw":"151.1"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$4.1","raw":"$4.1"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-412.7","raw":"-412.7"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$4,295.5","raw":"4295.5"}},{"year":{"formatted":"2005","raw":"2005"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$2,153.6","raw":"2153.6"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$2,472.0","raw":"2472.0"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-493.6","raw":"-493.6"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$173.5","raw":"173.5"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$1.8","raw":"$1.8"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-318.3","raw":"-318.3"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$4,592.2","raw":"4592.2"}},{"year":{"formatted":"2006","raw":"2006"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$2,406.9","raw":"2406.9"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$2,655.1","raw":"2655.1"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-434.5","raw":"-434.5"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$185.2","raw":"185.2"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$1.1","raw":"$1.1"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-248.2","raw":"-248.2"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$4,829.0","raw":"4829.0"}},{"year":{"formatted":"2007","raw":"2007"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$2,568.0","raw":"2568.0"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$2,728.7","raw":"2728.7"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-342.2","raw":"-342.2"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$186.5","raw":"186.5"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-5.1","raw":"$-5.1"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-160.7","raw":"-160.7"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$5,035.1","raw":"5035.1"}},{"year":{"formatted":"2008","raw":"2008"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$2,524.0","raw":"2524.0"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$2,982.5","raw":"2982.5"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-641.8","raw":"-641.8"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$185.7","raw":"185.7"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-2.4","raw":"$-2.4"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-458.6","raw":"-458.6"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$5,803.1","raw":"5803.1"}},{"year":{"formatted":"2009","raw":"2009"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$2,105.0","raw":"2105.0"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$3,517.7","raw":"3517.7"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-1,549.7","raw":"-1549.7"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$137.3","raw":"137.3"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-0.3","raw":"$-0.3"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-1,412.7","raw":"-1412.7"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$7,544.7","raw":"7544.7"}},{"year":{"formatted":"2010","raw":"2010"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$2,162.7","raw":"2162.7"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$3,457.1","raw":"3457.1"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-1,371.4","raw":"-1371.4"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$81.7","raw":"81.7"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-4.7","raw":"$-4.7"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-1,294.4","raw":"-1294.4"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$9,018.9","raw":"9018.9"}},{"year":{"formatted":"2011","raw":"2011"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$2,303.5","raw":"2303.5"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$3,603.1","raw":"3603.1"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-1,366.8","raw":"-1366.8"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$68.0","raw":"68.0"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-0.8","raw":"$-0.8"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-1,299.6","raw":"-1299.6"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$10,128.2","raw":"10128.2"}},{"year":{"formatted":"2012","raw":"2012"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$2,450.0","raw":"2450.0"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$3,536.9","raw":"3536.9"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-1,148.9","raw":"-1148.9"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$64.6","raw":"64.6"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$-2.7","raw":"$-2.7"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-1,087.0","raw":"-1087.0"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$11,281.1","raw":"11281.1"}},{"year":{"formatted":"2013","raw":"2013"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$2,775.1","raw":"2775.1"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$3,454.6","raw":"3454.6"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-719.0","raw":"-719.0"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$37.6","raw":"37.6"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$1.9","raw":"$1.9"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-679.5","raw":"-679.5"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$11,982.7","raw":"11982.7"}},{"year":{"formatted":"2014","raw":"2014"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$3,021.5","raw":"3021.5"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$3,506.1","raw":"3506.1"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-514.1","raw":"-514.1"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$27.0","raw":"27.0"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$2.5","raw":"$2.5"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-484.6","raw":"-484.6"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$12,779.9","raw":"12779.9"}},{"year":{"formatted":"2015","raw":"2015"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$3,249.9","raw":"3249.9"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$3,688.4","raw":"3688.4"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-465.8","raw":"-465.8"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$25.6","raw":"25.6"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$1.7","raw":"$1.7"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-438.5","raw":"-438.5"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$13,116.7","raw":"13116.7"}},{"year":{"formatted":"2016","raw":"2016"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$3,268.0","raw":"3268.0"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$3,852.6","raw":"3852.6"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-620.2","raw":"-620.2"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$34.1","raw":"34.1"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$1.4","raw":"$1.4"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-584.7","raw":"-584.7"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$14,167.6","raw":"14167.6"}},{"year":{"formatted":"2017","raw":"2017"},"revenue":{"formatted":"$3,316.2","raw":"3316.2"},"outlays":{"formatted":"$3,981.6","raw":"3981.6"},"on_budget_deficit":{"formatted":"$-714.8","raw":"-714.8"},"social_security":{"formatted":"$47.1","raw":"47.1"},"postal_service":{"formatted":"$2.3","raw":"$2.3"},"total_deficit":{"formatted":"$-665.4","raw":"-665.4"},"debt_held_by_public":{"formatted":"$14,665.5","raw":"14665.5"}}]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/database\/807"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/database"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/database"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=807"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projects.newsday.com\/databases\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=807"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}